Classification and Management of Metopic Craniosynostosis
Sydney T Yee1, Jeffrey A Fearon, Arun K Gosain
1*School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH †The Craniofacial Center, Dallas, TX ‡Division of Plastic Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL §Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Background:
In the craniofacial surgery literature, there is a wide disparity of opinions regarding the management of nonsyndromic metopic synostosis. With the lack of level I evidence to support a particular regimen, we aimed to elucidate the current state of practice among craniofacial surgeons with the hope of establishing a standard of care.
Methods:
A survey was sent to 102 craniofacial surgeons. The survey featured 2 parts: clinical scenarios and questions regarding the following: primary indication for surgery, preference of timing, and choice of operative intervention for patients presenting with nonsyndromic isolated metopic synostosis. Surgeons were also queried regarding preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative protocols.
Results:
The total response rate was 72% (73/102) for the clinical scenarios and 63% (64/102) for the complete survey. There was a large discrepancy when classifying and managing mild metopic synostosis, with between 16% and 35% of surgeons electing to operate on a mild case. All surgeons agreed to operate on moderate and severe cases. For 95% of respondents, skull deformity was the primary indication for treatment of craniosynostosis. Open surgical management was most commonly performed at 6 months (29%) of age. Open frontal orbital advancement was the most commonly performed procedure in mild (27%), moderate (77%), and severe (89%) cases. Endoscopic approaches were more likely to be used in milder cases by 19% of surgeons.
Conclusion:
Our survey demonstrates that there is a wide disparity of opinion among craniofacial surgeons regarding the diagnosis and management of mild nonsyndromic metopic synostosis.
Level Of Evidence:
Diagnostic, level 5.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
01:14Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
01:27Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
01:08Overview of the Skull
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
01:18Classification of Bones
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...