Resistance-Mutation (N31) Effects on Drug Orientation and Channel Hydration in Amantadine-Bound Influenza A M2
Mitchell L Gleed1, Harris Ioannidis2, Antonios Kolocouris2
1Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University , Provo, Utah 84602, United States.
Abstract:
The mechanism of amantadine binding to the S31 variant of the M2 protein of Influenza A is well understood, but the reasons behind N31 M2 amantadine insensitivity remain under investigation. Many molecular dynamics studies have evaluated the influence of amantadine position within the channel pore on its ability to inhibit proton conductance in M2, but little is known about the influence of amantadine rotational orientation. Replica-exchange umbrella sampling, steered, and classic molecular dynamics simulations were performed on amantadine in the solid-state NMR structure of S31 M2 and an N31 M2 homologue, both in the homotetramer configuration, to explore the effects of the position and tilt angle of amantadine on inhibition of the M2 channel. Steered simulations show that amantadine rotates with the amine toward the bulk water as it passes into the hydrophobic entryway lined by Val27 side chains. Results from all simulation types performed indicate that amantadine has a strong, specific orientation with the amine turned inward toward the central cavity in the S31 M2 pore but has variable orientation and a strong propensity to remain outward pointing in N31 M2. Free energy profiles from umbrella sampling, measured relative to bulk water, show amantadine binds more strongly to the S31 M2 pore by 8 kcal/mol in comparison to amantadine in the N31 pore, suggesting that it can escape more readily from the N31 channel through the Val27 secondary gate, whereas it is captured by the S31 channel in the same region. Lower water density and distribution near amantadine in S31 M2 reveal that the drug inhibits proton conductance in S31 M2 because of its inward-pointing configuration, whereas in N31 M2, amantadine forms hydrogen bonds with an N31 side chain and does not widely occlude water occupancy in any configuration. Both amantadine's weaker binding to and weaker water occlusion in N31 M2 might contribute to its inefficacy as an inhibitor of the mutant protein.
Insights
Amantadine insensitivity in N31 M2 influenza A variants is due to the drug’s altered binding orientation and weaker interaction within the channel. This study reveals how amantadine’s rotational orientation impacts its efficacy as an M2 proton channel inhibitor.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Computational Biology
- Virology
Background:
- Amantadine is an influenza A virus M2 channel inhibitor.
- The S31 M2 protein variant is sensitive to amantadine, while the N31 variant is insensitive.
- The role of amantadine's rotational orientation in M2 channel inhibition is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of amantadine's position and rotational orientation on its binding within S31 M2 and N31 M2 channels.
- To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying amantadine insensitivity in the N31 M2 variant.
Main Methods:
- Replica-exchange umbrella sampling, steered, and classic molecular dynamics simulations were employed.
- Simulations were performed on amantadine within the solid-state NMR structures of S31 M2 and N31 M2 homotetramers.
- Free energy profiles were calculated to assess amantadine binding affinity.
Main Results:
- Amantadine exhibits a specific inward-pointing orientation in S31 M2 but a variable, outward-pointing orientation in N31 M2.
- Amantadine binds 8 kcal/mol more strongly to S31 M2 than to N31 M2.
- In N31 M2, amantadine forms hydrogen bonds with an N31 side chain and does not effectively occlude water, unlike in S31 M2.
Conclusions:
- Amantadine's weaker binding and reduced water occlusion in N31 M2 contribute to its inefficacy against this variant.
- The specific inward orientation of amantadine in S31 M2 is crucial for inhibiting proton conductance.
- Understanding amantadine's rotational dynamics offers insights into developing new M2 channel inhibitors.
More Related Videos
08:31Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions
Published on: December 1, 2020
08:04Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug-Related Factors
One crucial factor in drug-protein binding is the drug's lipophilicity or its affinity for fat. More lipophilic drugs tend to have higher binding extents. For example, highly lipophilic drugs like cloxacillin exhibit substantial protein binding, with as much as 95% of the drug binding to proteins. In...
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug Interactions
Displacement interactions can have varying outcomes, ranging from toxicity to virtually...
Leaky Scanning
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Protein-Related Factors
The physicochemical properties of a drug play a significant role in its ability to bind to proteins. Lipophilic drugs, which dissolve in fats, oils, and lipids, can be...
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Antifungal Agents
