Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Crossing substantive domains.

¹Center for Community Research and Action, New York University, New York 10003.

American Journal of Community Psychology

|October 1, 1989

Summary

Understanding context is key. Explicitly varying context reveals how factors like coping and social support change, improving scientific generalization and domain-specific insights.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Stimulated-emission cross sections of the (5)F(1)-(5)I(5) and (5)F(1)-(5)I(6) transitions of Pm(3+) in a phosphate glass.

Optics letters·2009

Same author

Time-dependent, three-dimensional simulation of free-electron-laser oscillators.

Physical review letters·2009

Same author

Single-element laser beam shaper for uniform flat-top profiles.

Optics express·2009

Same author

Experimental limit on optical-photon coupling to light neutral scalar bosons.

Physical review letters·2008

Same author

Introduction of Stephanie Riger, the 2000 Recipient of the Society for Community Research and Action Award for Distinguished Contributions to Theory and Research.

American journal of community psychology·2001

Same author

The relationship of residential instability to medical care utilization among poor mothers in New York City.

Medical care·1999

Area of Science:

Psychology
Social Sciences

Background:

Generalizations in psychology often overlook contextual nuances.
A balance is needed between deep contextual immersion and overly broad theories.

Purpose of the Study:

Advocate for a middle-ground approach in research methodology.
Highlight the importance of explicit contextual variation for robust findings.
Emphasize cross-domain comparison for theoretical and specific insights.

Main Methods:

Analyzing studies where context was explicitly varied.
Examining the influence of context on coping efforts and social support.
Utilizing cross-domain comparisons to test theoretical frameworks.

Main Results:

Content and effects of coping and social support are context-dependent.
Explicit contextual variation enhances understanding of constraints.
Cross-domain comparisons yielded valuable theoretical and domain-specific insights.

Conclusions:

A balanced approach integrating contextual variation is crucial for scientific advancement.
Explicitly manipulating context improves the validity of research findings.
Comparative analysis across different fields deepens understanding of psychological phenomena.

Related Experiment Videos