Related Concept Videos
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Language and Cognition
Components of Language
Language
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
The contributions of language and inhibitory control to false belief reasoning over time.
Dialect-neutral indices of narrative cohesion and evaluation.
Deception dissociates from false belief reasoning in deaf children: implications for the implicit versus explicit theory of mind distinction.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
Assessment of language acquisition.
Peter A de Villiers1, Jill G de Villiers1
1Smith College, Department of Psychology, Northampton, MA, USA.
This review explores effective language assessment methods for identifying children's strengths and weaknesses. It emphasizes content validity and unbiased evaluation for diverse linguistic backgrounds, advocating for process-oriented measures.
Area of Science:
- Child language acquisition
- Developmental psychology
- Linguistic assessment
Background:
- Language assessment design is critical for diagnosis, intervention planning, and research.
- Precise language profiles are essential for defining phenotypes of language and neurodevelopmental disorders.
- Formal tests and language sampling have distinct benefits and costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review optimal methods for assessing language acquisition.
- To explore content validity and its importance in assessment.
- To address challenges in unbiased assessment for diverse populations.
Main Methods:
- Review of formal tests versus language sampling.
- Discussion of content validity grounded in child language acquisition theory.
More Related Videos
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
06:35Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
Published on: April 28, 2016
Main Results:
- Content validity is paramount for accurate assessment and interpretation.
- Existing assessment standards may be biased against certain groups or dialects.
- New approaches like dynamic assessment and generalization studies offer promising alternatives.
Conclusions:
- Assessment must be theoretically and empirically grounded in child language acquisition.
- Unbiased assessment is crucial for diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds.
- Focusing on the process of acquisition, not just achievement levels, is vital.