Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

391
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
391
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

374
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
374
Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.1K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.1K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

10.3K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
10.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cost-effectiveness analysis of implementing a medication monitor and differentiated care approach among people with TB in South Africa.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Longitudinal serological detection of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of pregnant women in Malawi: a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Safety of short-course weekly rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP) for TB preventive treatment at conception and during first trimester in women living with HIV: a secondary analysis of WHIP3TB trial.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026
Same author

Concepts of psychosocial distress and help-seeking preferences among Indigenous adolescents: A qualitative study from Jharkhand, India.

PLOS mental health·2026
Same author

Manualised package intervention to achieve treatment adherence in people with tuberculosis: the IMPACT pilot cluster-RCT.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Power and Ethics in Peer Research With Young People: A Critical Review of the Health and Social Work Literature.

Qualitative health research·2026
Same journal

Treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause with fractional COâ‚‚ laser versus fractional microablative radiofrequency: study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Trials·2026
Same journal

TaILOR: a randomised trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) strategy compared to standard care pathways in people with inflammatory arthritis: a study protocol.

Trials·2026
Same journal

Scaling up community-based non-communicable disease research into practice in Pokhara Metropolitan City of Nepal (SCALE-NCD) trial: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
Same journal

EECP intervention and coronary flow reserve in chronic coronary syndrome: a protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled study in China (ECP-Core Trial).

Trials·2026
Same journal

Impact of early tracheostomy in infratentorial lesions trial: rationale and design.

Trials·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

How important is randomisation in a stepped wedge trial?

James R Hargreaves1, Audrey Prost2, Katherine L Fielding3

  • 1Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. James.hargreaves@lshtm.ac.uk.

Trials
|August 16, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Randomization is crucial for stepped wedge trials, enhancing validity and controlling for time-related biases. Implementing randomization ensures more rigorous evaluations and transparent results in cluster trials.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) rely on randomization for internal validity and unbiased allocation.
  • Stepped wedge trials (SWTs) involve clusters receiving an intervention sequentially, with all eventually participating.
  • Recent protocols have questioned randomization in SWTs due to logistical and ethical concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the benefits of randomization in stepped wedge trials.
  • To highlight the importance of randomization for controlling secular trends and ensuring unbiased analysis.
  • To address the assumption that randomization does not significantly add rigor to modified stepped wedge trial evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • The study theoretically evaluates the impact of randomization on the validity of stepped wedge trial analyses.
  • It contrasts horizontal and vertical comparison methods for analyzing SWTs.
  • It discusses the use of mixed-effects models to account for secular trends and cluster effects.

Main Results:

  • Randomization in SWTs, similar to CRTs, increases internal validity and transparency.
  • Randomization enables the estimation of time effects and control for secular trends.
  • Vertical comparisons in randomized SWTs are unbiased, unlike horizontal comparisons which assume no secular trends.

Conclusions:

  • Randomization is essential for robust stepped wedge trial design and analysis, even in modified protocols.
  • It mitigates bias from secular trends by allowing for the estimation of time effects.
  • The benefits of randomization in CRTs extend to SWTs, ensuring more reliable and rigorous study outcomes.