Related Experiment Videos
Using a systematic review in clinical decision making: a pilot parallel, randomized controlled trial
Laure Perrier1, Nav Persaud2, Kevin E Thorpe3
1Institute of Health Management, Policy and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada. l.perrier@utoronto.ca.
Background:
Evidence suggests that systematic reviews are used infrequently by physicians in clinical decision-making. One proposed solution is to create filtered resources so that information is validated and refined in order to be read quickly. Two shortened systematic review formats were developed to enhance their use in clinical decision-making.
Methods:
To prepare for a full-scale trial, we conducted a pilot study to test methods and procedures in order to refine the processes. A recruitment email was sent to physicians practicing full- or part-time in family medicine or general internal medicine. The pilot study took place in an online environment and eligible physicians were randomized to one of the systematic review formats (shortened or full-length) and instructed to read the document. Participants were asked to provide the clinical bottom line and apply the information presented to a clinical scenario. Participants' answers were evaluated independently by two investigators against "gold standard" answers prepared by an expert panel.
Results:
Fifty-six clinicians completed the pilot study within a 2-month period with a response rate of 4.3 %. Agreement between investigators in assessing participants' answers was determined by calculating a kappa statistic. Two questions were assessed separately, and a kappa statistic was calculated at 1.00 (100 % agreement) for each.
Conclusions:
Agreement between investigators in assessing participants' answers is satisfactory. Although recruitment for the pilot study was completed in a reasonable time-frame, response rates were low and will require large numbers of contacts. The results indicate that conducting a full-scale trial is feasible.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02414360 .
Related Concept Videos
Critical Thinking II
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...