Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Intracellular Phosphoflow Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenotransplants
Published on: June 6, 2025
Setting Appropriate Goals for the Next Generation of Clinical Trials in Myelofibrosis
1Center for the Study of Myelofibrosis, Biotechnology Research Area, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo Foundation, Viale Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. barosig@smatteo.pv.it.
Abstract:
New targeted therapies administered in phase II and phase III studies have produced substantial improvements in outcomes of myelofibrosis (MF). However, strong documentation that the new agents modify the natural history of the disease is lacking, and a number of therapeutic indications of new drugs remain unaddressed. Overall survival (OS) improvement is the major goal of next-generation clinical trials in MF. This may be attained if an adequate population of patients and an unambiguous design of the trial will be selected. Another goal is preventing disease progression in early MF: this requires a controlled clinical trial with an accessible endpoint and a clinically relevant definition of disease progression. Improvement in the documentation of responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) will allow to use them as a critical endpoint of new trials. Finally, exploiting the clinical utility of biomarkers should become a major goal of future clinical experimentation in MF.
Insights
New targeted therapies show promise for myelofibrosis (MF) patients, but further research is needed to confirm their impact on disease progression and overall survival (OS). Future trials should focus on clear endpoints and biomarkers.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Targeted therapies have improved outcomes in myelofibrosis (MF).
- Evidence demonstrating modification of MF's natural history by new agents is limited.
- Unmet therapeutic needs persist in MF treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline key considerations for future clinical trials in myelofibrosis.
- To emphasize the importance of overall survival (OS) as a primary endpoint.
- To highlight the need for improved methods to assess disease progression and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Main Methods:
- Review of current therapeutic landscape and clinical trial designs in MF.
- Discussion of optimal patient populations and trial designs for next-generation studies.
- Emphasis on incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and biomarkers.
Main Results:
- Substantial improvements in MF outcomes observed with new targeted therapies.
- Lack of robust data on the modification of MF's natural disease course.
- Identification of critical areas for future clinical trial development.
Conclusions:
- Future myelofibrosis trials must prioritize overall survival (OS) and disease progression endpoints.
- Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and biomarkers is crucial for advancing MF research.
- Careful trial design and patient selection are essential for demonstrating meaningful clinical benefit.
More Related Videos
10:49Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
09:57Comprehensive Protocol to Sample and Process Bone Marrow for Measuring Measurable Residual Disease and Leukemic Stem Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published on: March 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...