Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When are sex-specific effects really sex-specific?

E H Chin1, J K Christians1

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences,Simon Fraser University,Burnaby,Canada.

Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
|August 19, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Many developmental programming studies incorrectly identify sex-specific effects without proper statistical testing. Researchers should use interaction terms or Bayesian methods for robust analysis of sex differences in treatment effects.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diaphragmatic eventration presenting as a recurrent diaphragmatic hernia.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2017
Same author

Placental invasion, preeclampsia risk and adaptive molecular evolution at the origin of the great apes: evidence from genome-wide analyses.

Placenta·2012
Same author

Reduction of an incarcerated, prolapsed ileostomy with the assistance of sugar as a desiccant.

Techniques in coloproctology·2009
Same author

Minimally invasive surgery for splenic malignancies.

Minerva chirurgica·2008
Same author

Analysis of steroids in songbird plasma and brain by coupling solid phase extraction to radioimmunoassay.

General and comparative endocrinology·2007
Same author

Multimedia article. Laparoscopic repair of a perforated marginal ulcer 2 years after gastric bypass.

Surgical endoscopy·2007

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive biology
  • Developmental toxicology
  • Statistical genetics

Background:

  • Developmental programming studies investigate how early-life exposures impact later health.
  • Sex-specific effects are frequently reported, but their statistical validation is often inadequate.
  • Current methods for identifying sex-specific effects may lack robustness and lead to misinterpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the statistical rigor of sex-specific effect reporting in developmental programming literature.
  • To identify common methodologies used to ascertain sex-specific effects.
  • To propose improved statistical approaches for analyzing sex differences.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of developmental programming studies published between 2012 and 2014 reporting sex-specific effects.
Keywords:
Bayesiandevelopmental origins of health and diseasedevelopmental programmingsex-specific effects

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of statistical methods employed to test for differences between sexes.
  • Illustrative example of a Bayesian analysis for comparing sex-specific effect sizes.

    • Main Results:

    • Less than half of the reviewed studies explicitly tested for sex-specific effects using appropriate statistical methods like interaction terms.
    • Many studies incorrectly inferred sex-specificity based on significance in one sex and non-significance in the other.
    • Low statistical power due to sample size limitations often hinders the detection of interaction terms.

    Conclusions:

    • Current practices for reporting sex-specific effects in developmental programming are often statistically unsound.
    • Alternative methods, including presenting confidence intervals or employing Bayesian analyses, are recommended for robustly determining sex differences.
    • Bayesian approaches offer a practical and interpretable solution for assessing the probability of differing effect sizes between sexes.