Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Characterization of Inflammatory Responses During Intranasal Colonization with Streptococcus pneumoniae
Published on: January 17, 2014
Risk of MRSA Infection in Patients with Intermittent versus Persistent MRSA Nares Colonization
Daniel I Vigil1, Wesley D Harden1, Anne E Hines2
11University of Colorado,Preventive Medicine Residency,Aurora,Colorado.
Objective:
To determine the relative risk of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection among non-colonized (NC) patients, intermittently colonized (IC) patients, and persistently colonized (PC) patients.
Design:
Observational cohort study of patient data collected longitudinally over a 41-month period.
Setting:
Department of Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, a tertiary care medical center.
Patients:
Any patient who received ≥5 MRSA nasal swab tests between February 20, 2010, and July 26, 2013. In total, 3,872 patients met these criteria, 0 were excluded, 95% were male, 71% were white, and the mean age was 62.9 years on the date of study entry.
Methods:
Patients were divided into cohorts based on MRSA colonization status. Physicians reviewed medical records to identify invasive infection and were blinded to colonization status. Cox and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the relationship between colonization status and invasive infection.
Results:
In total, 102 patients developed invasive MRSA infections, 16.3% of these were PC patients, 11.2% of these were IC patients, and 0.5% of these were NC patients. PC patients were at higher risk of invasive infection than NC patients (hazard ratio [HR] 36.8; 95% CI, 18.4-73.6; P<.001). IC patients were also at higher risk than NC patients (HR, 22.8; 95% CI, 13.3-39.3; P<.001). The difference in risk between PC and IC patients was not statistically significant (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.94-2.78, P=.084). Alternate analysis methods confirmed these results.
Conclusions:
The risk of invasive MRSA infection is much higher among PC and IC patients, supporting routine clinical testing for colonization. However, this risk is similar among PC and IC patients, suggesting that distinguishing between the 2 colonization states may not be clinically important.
Insights
Patients with persistent or intermittent colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) face a significantly higher risk of invasive infection. This highlights the importance of MRSA screening for all patients.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Microbiology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a significant threat in healthcare settings.
- Understanding the relationship between MRSA colonization status and invasive infection risk is crucial for effective patient management.
- Previous studies have explored MRSA colonization but further clarification on risk stratification is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the relative risk of developing invasive MRSA infections among patients with no MRSA colonization (NC), intermittent colonization (IC), and persistent colonization (PC).
Main Methods:
- An observational cohort study was conducted over 41 months at a tertiary care medical center.
- 3,872 patients with at least 5 MRSA nasal swab tests were categorized into NC, IC, and PC groups.
- Cox and Kaplan-Meier analyses were employed to evaluate the association between colonization status and invasive infection.
Main Results:
- 102 patients developed invasive MRSA infections.
- Persistently colonized (PC) patients had a 36.8-fold higher risk, and intermittently colonized (IC) patients had a 22.8-fold higher risk compared to non-colonized (NC) patients.
- The risk of invasive infection was similar between PC and IC patients (HR 1.61).
Conclusions:
- Both persistently and intermittently colonized patients exhibit a substantially elevated risk of invasive MRSA infection compared to non-colonized individuals.
- Routine clinical testing for MRSA colonization is supported by these findings.
- Distinguishing between persistent and intermittent colonization may not be clinically critical due to similar risk profiles.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Microbiota of the Respiratory Tract
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Epistaxis
Etiology
Possible causes of this condition include high blood pressure, trauma, low humidity, upper respiratory tract infections, allergies, foreign bodies, nasal inhalation of corticosteroids or illicit drugs, excessive use of decongestant nasal sprays, facial or nasal surgery, anatomic malformation, tumors, or systemic...

