Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).

Frequency-dependent Selection

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.

Mismatch Repair

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...

Types of Selection

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

Mutations in Microorganisms

Mutations in Microorganisms

Mutations are heritable changes in an organism’s genome involving alterations in the base sequence of DNA or RNA. These changes can influence cellular processes and phenotypic traits, potentially transforming the unaltered wild type into a mutant form. Such changes, termed forward mutations, are pivotal in shaping the genetic diversity of organisms.RNA viruses exhibit the highest mutation rates due to the absence of robust proofreading mechanisms during genome replication. In contrast,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Negative frequency-dependent selection: a positive outlook with deep learning.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026

Same author

Haplotype-Based Models Improve Sweep Detection in Ancient Populations with Complex Demography.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Insights into human adaptation from ancient DNA.

Nature genetics·2026

Same author

Seasonal fluctuations in fitness result in severe reductions in effective population size.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Identification and comparison of orthologous cell types from primate embryoid bodies shows limits of marker gene transferability.

eLife·2026

Same author

AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.

Evolution letters·2026

Same journal

Demography and Environment Shapes Genetic Variation: Spatiotemporal Genetic Dynamics in Cyclic Voles at Low Latitudes.

Molecular ecology·2026

Same journal

Gut Microbiome-Metabolome Reconfiguration Associates With Phenotypic Plasticity of Daphnia Under Predation Risk.

Molecular ecology·2026

Same journal

Population Genomics Highlight the Vulnerability of Coral-Dwelling Gobies to Ecological Losses due to Climatic Disturbances.

Molecular ecology·2026

Same journal

Ancient Divergences of the Maritime Alpine Tree Larix lyallii (Pinaceae) Contrasts With Patterns in Other Pacific Northwest Coastal Disjuncts.

Molecular ecology·2026

Same journal

Ontogenetic Sequence of Differential Gene Expression in Predator-Induced Daphnia pulex.

Molecular ecology·2026

Same journal

Disentangling Environmental and Within-Host Drivers of Parasite Dynamics in Natural Populations.

Molecular ecology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Detecting recent selective sweeps while controlling for mutation rate and background selection.

Christian D Huber^1,2,3, Michael DeGiorgio^4,5, Ines Hellmann⁶

¹Max F. Perutz Laboratory, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Molecular Ecology

|August 21, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study enhances selective sweep detection by incorporating invariable sites and accounting for mutation rate variation. The improved method offers more powerful and precise identification of recent positive selection in genomes.

Keywords:

Hudson-Kreitman-Aguadé test background selection population bottlenecks sweep detection sweepfinder

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Detection of Low-Frequency Mutations in Cancer Tissues

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Detection of Low-Frequency Mutations in Cancer Tissues

Published on: August 23, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Detection of Low-Frequency Mutations in Cancer Tissues

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Detection of Low-Frequency Mutations in Cancer Tissues

Published on: August 23, 2024

Area of Science:

Population Genetics
Genomics
Evolutionary Biology

Background:

Selective sweeps are crucial for understanding adaptation.
Current methods like sweepfinder primarily use within-species variation.
Invariable sites and mutation rate variation can limit detection power.

Purpose of the Study:

To improve the power and precision of detecting recent selective sweeps.
To develop a method that incorporates invariable sites and accounts for mutation rate variation.
To model background selection effects for more robust analyses.

Main Methods:

Developed a composite likelihood ratio test incorporating fixed differences relative to an outgroup.
Modeled background selection as a local reduction in effective population size.
Utilized genome-wide simulations to assess method performance.

Main Results:

The new method significantly increases the power to detect and localize selective sweeps.
Robustness to mutation rate variation is maintained.
Improved localization precision compared to methods using only segregating sites.

Conclusions:

Incorporating invariable sites and outgroup comparisons enhances selective sweep detection.
The developed method provides a more powerful and precise tool for evolutionary genomic studies.
This approach offers a more comprehensive understanding of recent positive selection in populations.