A validated risk model for 1-year mortality after primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement

Paul A Heidenreich1, Vivian Tsai2, Jeptha Curtis3

  • 1VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, 94304.

American Heart Journal
|August 25, 2015
PubMed

Insights

A new risk score helps identify heart failure patients unlikely to benefit from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). This tool predicts 1-year mortality risk, aiding treatment decisions for primary prevention.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Devices
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are used for primary prevention in heart failure patients.
  • Clinical trials suggest that ICDs may not benefit patients with a 1-year mortality risk near 20%.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine survival rates for heart failure patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention in the U.S.
  • To develop a predictive model for mortality risk in this population.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the ICD Registry (2007-2009) for patients undergoing ICD implantation.
  • Developed two mortality risk scores: one including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and one for all patients.
  • Employed logistic regression and classification and regression trees for score derivation and validation.

Main Results:

  • Identified six key predictors of 1-year mortality in patients with available BNP: age ≥75, BNP ≥700 pg/mL, chronic lung disease, dialysis, BUN ≥30 mg/dL, and systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg.
  • Mortality ranged from 3.3% (zero risk factors) to 66.7% (all six risk factors).
  • Approximately 24% of patients with ≥3 risk factors had a 25.8% 1-year mortality; a similar score was developed without BNP.

Conclusions:

  • A validated risk score can effectively stratify patients into high- and low-risk categories for 1-year mortality post-ICD placement.
  • A significant proportion of U.S. patients receiving ICDs for primary prevention exhibit high 1-year mortality, potentially not benefiting from the device.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care01:29

Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

Managing cardiomyopathy involves addressing underlying or precipitating causes, treating heart failure with medications, and implementing dietary changes and a balanced exercise and rest regimen.Lifestyle ModificationsCardiomyopathy patients should adopt a low-sodium diet to reduce fluid retention and manage heart failure. A personalized exercise and rest plan helps maintain physical fitness without overstraining the heart. Avoiding alcohol and tobacco is essential to prevent further damage to...
656
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures01:26

Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures

Effective preventive measures for coronary artery disease (CAD) focus on controlling modifiable risk factors, including cholesterol abnormalities and lifestyle changes.Cholesterol ManagementFirst, the Mediterranean diet and the American Heart Association advocate for maintaining low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels below 100 mg/dL, with a more stringent recommendation of below 70 mg/dL for individuals at high risk. LDL cholesterol, often termed "bad cholesterol," can lead to the...
858
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management01:22

Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

IntroductionA range of clinical features characterizes Mitral Valve Prolapse (MVP), but it is important to note that many individuals with MVP are asymptomatic and may remain so throughout their lives. For those who do exhibit symptoms, the following are the key clinical features:Palpitations: This is a common symptom where individuals feel an irregular or rapid heartbeat. Palpitations in MVP are often due to arrhythmias such as premature ventricular contractions or supraventricular...
1.1K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.6K