Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
Published on: March 11, 2022
A consensus definition and rating scale for minimalist shoes
Jean-Francois Esculier1, Blaise Dubois2, Clermont E Dionne3
1Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC Canada ; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec Rehabilitation Institute, 525, Boulevard Wilfrid Hamel, Quebec City, QC Canada, G1M 2S8 ; The Running Clinic, Quebec City, QC Canada.
Researchers defined minimalist running shoes and developed the Minimalist Index (MI) to quantify shoe minimalism. This standardized approach aims to improve research and reduce running-related injuries.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Medicine
- Footwear Technology
Background:
- The term "minimalist running shoes" lacks standardization, potentially impacting biomechanics and injury rates.
- Existing definitions do not adequately capture the nuances of minimalist footwear.
- A need exists for a quantifiable measure of running shoe minimalism.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a consensus-based definition of minimalist running shoes.
- To develop and validate the Minimalist Index (MI) for quantifying shoe minimalism.
- To provide a reliable tool for classifying running shoes.
Main Methods:
- A modified Delphi study involving 42 international experts.
- Development of the Minimalist Index (MI) based on expert consensus.
- Validation of MI using subjective rankings and visual analog scales (VAS) with 85 participants.
- Assessment of construct validity and inter/intra-rater reliability (ICC, Gwet's AC1).
Main Results:
- A consensus definition of minimalist shoes was achieved: high flexibility, low heel-to-toe drop, low weight/stack height, and absence of motion control.
- The MI incorporates weight, flexibility, heel-to-toe drop, stack height, and motion control/stability devices (20% weighting each).
- MI demonstrated high correlation with VAS (r=0.91), significant discriminative validity, and excellent reliability (ICC=0.84-0.99).
Conclusions:
- A standardized definition and the Minimalist Index (MI) were developed by international experts.
- The MI is a valid and reliable tool for differentiating running shoes by their degree of minimalism.
- This standardization may enhance future research and clinical recommendations, potentially reducing footwear-related injuries.
More Related Videos
06:35Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
Published on: September 14, 2017
06:28Author Spotlight: Developing Low-Tech Balance Assessment Methods for Broad-Spectrum Healthcare Applications
Published on: September 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Confidence Coefficient
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Conformity