Comparative effectiveness of treatment strategies for severe splenic trauma in the pediatric population

Kristy L Rialon1, Brian R Englum1, Brian C Gulack1

  • 1Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Insights

Splenic angioembolization (SAE) in children with high-grade splenic trauma shows similar outcomes to splenectomy. This minimally invasive approach offers comparable safety and effectiveness for pediatric splenic injuries.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Trauma Surgery
  • Interventional Radiology
  • Emergency Medicine

Background:

  • Splenic angioembolization (SAE) is gaining traction for adult splenic injuries, but its efficacy in pediatric cases remains uncertain.
  • Evaluating SAE versus splenectomy is crucial for optimizing pediatric trauma care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of splenectomy and SAE in pediatric patients with splenic trauma.
  • To assess the safety and effectiveness of SAE in managing high-grade splenic injuries in children.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2011) for pediatric patients (0-15 years) with splenic trauma.
  • Conducted a propensity analysis and inverse probability weighting for subgroup analysis of high-grade injuries comparing splenectomy and SAE.

Main Results:

  • Over 90% of 11,694 pediatric splenic trauma cases were managed nonoperatively.
  • In high-grade injuries, 265 children had splenectomy and 199 underwent SAE; no significant differences in Injury Severity Score, transfusions, or complications.
  • Adjusted mortality was 13.4% for splenectomy and 10.0% for SAE (P = .31).

Conclusions:

  • Splenic angioembolization (SAE) is a viable alternative to splenectomy for high-grade pediatric splenic trauma.
  • SAE demonstrates comparable morbidity and mortality rates to splenectomy in this pediatric cohort.
Abstract