Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

08:41
Mouse Round Spermatid Injection
Published on: January 26, 2024
1.7K
Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection versus conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a
Giovanni Battista La Sala1,2, Alessia Nicoli1, Eleonora Fornaciari1
1Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova of Reggio Emilia, IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E
|August 27, 2015
Summary
Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) did not improve live birth rates compared to conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (cICSI) in infertile men. This study suggests IMSI is not routinely recommended for unselected infertile couples.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Infertility Treatment
- Assisted Reproductive Technology
Background:
- Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) is used to enhance reproductive outcomes in infertile couples undergoing conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (cICSI).
- The efficacy of IMSI in improving live birth rates compared to cICSI remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate whether IMSI offers a superior live birth delivery rate compared to cICSI in infertile couples with male factor.
- To test the hypothesis that IMSI improves reproductive outcomes in a specific patient population.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted involving infertile couples scheduled for their first cICSI cycle due to male factor.
- Participants were randomized, and data were collected and analyzed in a triple-blind manner.
- The trial was prematurely stopped due to concerns about IMSI efficacy.
Main Results:
- The final analysis included 121 patients (48 in IMSI arm, 73 in cICSI arm).
- No significant difference was observed in clinical pregnancy rates (18.8% vs. 15.1%) or live birth delivery rates (18.8% vs. 15.1%) between the IMSI and cICSI groups.
- Statistical analysis showed no significant improvement with IMSI (P=0.594).
Conclusions:
- The current evidence does not support the routine clinical use of IMSI for enhancing cICSI outcomes in unselected infertile couples with male factor.
- Further research may be needed to identify specific patient subgroups who could benefit from IMSI.

