Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Comparison of measurement methods with a mixed effects procedure accounting for replicated evaluations (COM3PARE):
Anuradha Roy1, Clifton D Fuller2, David I Rosenthal3
1Department of Management Science and Statistics, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, 78249, TX, USA. Anuradha.Roy@utsa.edu.
A new method, COM3PARE, effectively compares image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) devices. It found differences in positional verification between cone beam CT and kilovoltage X-ray imaging for head and neck cancer patients.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Technology
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Comparing imaging measurement devices, especially in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), is challenging due to the lack of gold standards and replicated measurements.
- The proliferation of IGRT devices necessitates a robust method to assess interchangeability between different imaging techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and utility of the Comparison of Measurement Methods with the Mixed Effects Procedure Accounting for Replicated Evaluations (COM3PARE) for IGRT method comparison.
- To assess agreement between cone beam CT (CBCT) and kilovoltage X-ray (KVX) imaging in head and neck cancer patient positional verification using COM3PARE.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a dataset of 100 paired coordinate measurements from head and neck cancer patients imaged with CBCT and KVX.
- Applied the COM3PARE methodology, based on linear mixed effects models, using SAS software to analyze bias, inter-method, intra-method, and overall agreement.
- Evaluated positional shifts in lateral (X), vertical (Y), and longitudinal (Z) dimensions.
Main Results:
- COM3PARE identified statistically significant differences in bias and inter-method agreement for the Z-axis between CBCT and KVX (p < 0.01).
- Statistically significant differences in intra-method and overall agreement were observed for both X and Z axes (p < 0.01).
- CBCT was preferred for X-axis positional verification, while KVX was preferred for superoinferior (Z-axis) alignment based on intra-method agreement.
Conclusions:
- The COM3PARE methodology proved feasible and useful for comparing IGRT methods in a head and neck cancer dataset.
- COM3PARE offers a flexible, robust, and standardized analytical approach for IGRT comparisons.
- A SAS script for COM3PARE is provided to facilitate its adoption in other clinical settings and for different IGRT platforms.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Group Design
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

