Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods01:18

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods

761
Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
761

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of expanded graphene on physical and chemical properties, and <i>in vitro</i> toxicity of glass ionomer cements for luting.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry·2026
Same author

Evaluation of enamel surface after removal of clear aligner composite attachments using different methods: An in-vitro randomised study.

Journal of orthodontics·2026
Same author

When does Orthodontics make a difference? Threshold effects in attractiveness perception and hiring intentions.

Dental press journal of orthodontics·2026
Same author

Comparing Facial Attractiveness and Professional Acceptance Between Real and AI-Generated Orthodontic Treatment Outcome Images.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2026
Same author

Extraction or nonextraction: Preference and final tooth position.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same author

Do Children and Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Use Screens More? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
07:42

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

Published on: December 20, 2024

950

Enamel Quality after Debonding: Evaluation by Optical Coherence Tomography.

Jorge César Borges Leão Filho1, Ana Karla Souza Braz2, Renato Evangelista de Araujo1

  • 1Dentistry Post-graduation Program in Orthodontics, School of Health and Biosciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, BR.

Brazilian Dental Journal
|August 28, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Ceramic brackets cause enamel fractures during debonding, unlike metal brackets. Low-speed burs are more effective for removing adhesive remnants after bracket removal, ensuring cleaner enamel surfaces.

More Related Videos

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

1.0K
Nondestructive Monitoring of Degradable Scaffold-Based Tissue-Engineered Blood Vessel Development Using Optical Coherence Tomography
11:12

Nondestructive Monitoring of Degradable Scaffold-Based Tissue-Engineered Blood Vessel Development Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: October 3, 2018

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
07:42

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

Published on: December 20, 2024

950
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

1.0K
Nondestructive Monitoring of Degradable Scaffold-Based Tissue-Engineered Blood Vessel Development Using Optical Coherence Tomography
11:12

Nondestructive Monitoring of Degradable Scaffold-Based Tissue-Engineered Blood Vessel Development Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: October 3, 2018

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Biomaterials Engineering

Background:

  • Debonding orthodontic brackets can cause iatrogenic damage to tooth enamel.
  • Assessing enamel integrity and adhesive remnants is crucial for restorative procedures.
  • Ceramic brackets are aesthetically preferred but may pose a higher risk of enamel damage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively evaluate enamel fractures and adhesive remnants after debonding metal and ceramic brackets.
  • To compare the effectiveness of two debonding techniques (Side Cutter and Anterior Bracket Removal plier).
  • To quantify the depth of adhesive remnants after two different cleanup procedures using burs.

Main Methods:

  • 120 human incisors were bonded with metal or ceramic brackets.
  • Debonding was performed using Side Cutter (SC) or Anterior Bracket Removal plier (ABR).
  • Enamel assessment and adhesive remnant quantification were done using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) before and after cleanup with high-speed or low-speed tungsten carbide burs.

Main Results:

  • Enamel fractures were exclusively observed with ceramic brackets; debonding technique did not affect enamel damage.
  • Neither debonding technique nor bracket type influenced the amount of remaining adhesive.
  • Low-speed tungsten carbide burs demonstrated superior effectiveness in removing adhesive remnants during cleanup.

Conclusions:

  • Ceramic brackets present a higher risk of enamel fractures during debonding compared to metal brackets.
  • The choice of debonding pliers does not significantly impact enamel damage or residual adhesive.
  • Low-speed burs are recommended for efficient and effective adhesive remnant removal post-debonding.