Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research
Published on: December 15, 2023
The Biobehavioral Family Model: Close relationships and allostatic load
Jacob B Priest1, Sarah B Woods2, Candice A Maier1
1University of Iowa, Department of Rehabilitation and Counselor Education, N372 Lindquist Center, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Rationale:
This study tested the inclusion of allostatic load as an expansion of the biobehavioral reactivity measurement in the Biobehavioral Family Model (BBFM). The BBFM is a biopsychosocial approach to health which proposes biobehavioral reactivity (anxiety and depression) mediates the relationship between family emotional climate and disease activity.
Methods:
Data for this study included a subsample of n = 1255 single and married, English-speaking adult participants (57% female, M age = 56 years) from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS II), a nationally representative epidemiological study of health and aging in the United States. Participants completed self-reported measures of family and marital functioning, anxiety and depression (biobehavioral reactivity), number of chronic health conditions, number of prescribed medications, and a biological protocol in which the following indices were obtained: cardiovascular functioning, sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system activity, hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis activity, inflammation, lipid/fat metabolism, and glucose metabolism.
Results:
Structural equation modeling indicated good fit of the data to the hypothesized family model (χ (2) = 125.13 p = .00, SRMR = .03, CFI = .96, TLI = .94, RMSEA = .04) and hypothesized couple model (χ(2) = 132.67, p = .00, SRMR = .04, CFI = .95, TLI = .93, RMSEA = .04). Negative family interactions predicted biobehavioral reactivity for anxiety and depression and allostatic load; however couple interactions predicted only depression and anxiety measures of biobehavioral reactivity.
Conclusion:
Findings suggest the importance of incorporating physiological data in measuring biobehavioral reactivity as a predicting factor in the overall BBFM model.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Growth
Importance of Need for Affiliation
Close Relationships and Culture
Social Relationships and Well-Being
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings
Relationship with Parents: Attachment

