Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Unusual Results01:16

Unusual Results

4.2K
Unusual results are those that have a very low chance of occurring. Unusual results can be identified using probabilities and the range rule of thumb. In problems involving probability, unusual results can be observed in 2 instances – an unusually high number of successes or an unusually low number of successes.
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ  from the mean, μ  is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
4.2K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.1K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.1K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.4K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

10.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
10.1K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

9.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
9.1K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

4.6K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How (not) to study deviance sensitivity and predictive coding in auditory cortex.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Thalamic activation of the visual cortex at the single-synapse level.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Parsing auditory neural code into maximum-entropy packets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Sound preferences in mice are sex dependent.

Cell reports·2025
Same author

Task-related activity in auditory cortex enhances sound representation.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Amyloid β-dependent neuronal silencing through synaptic decoupling.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Population codes for context-dependent decision-making.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Cichlid fish as a model for understanding social dysfunction.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

On aims and methods in field neuroethology: Investigating neural mechanisms of behavior in semi-natural and natural contexts.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Neurobiological interfaces connecting environmental change to monarch butterfly migration.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Learning how to experience the world: From circuits to cell types to genes.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same journal

Editorial overview for neurobiology of disease 2026.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

522

Detecting the unexpected.

Leila Khouri1, Israel Nelken1

  • 1Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences and the Department of Neuroscience, The Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel.

Current Opinion in Neurobiology
|August 31, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans and animals adapt to sensory input through short-term plasticity, updating responses within minutes. Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and Stimulus Specific Adaptation (SSA) reveal surprise and predictive processing mechanisms.

Failed At:

2026-06-19T13:37:23.121563+00:00

More Related Videos

A Precise and Autonomous System for the Detection of Insect Emergence Patterns
06:22

A Precise and Autonomous System for the Detection of Insect Emergence Patterns

Published on: January 9, 2019

6.3K
In Situ Soil Moisture Sensors in Undisturbed Soils
08:20

In Situ Soil Moisture Sensors in Undisturbed Soils

Published on: November 18, 2022

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

522
A Precise and Autonomous System for the Detection of Insect Emergence Patterns
06:22

A Precise and Autonomous System for the Detection of Insect Emergence Patterns

Published on: January 9, 2019

6.3K
In Situ Soil Moisture Sensors in Undisturbed Soils
08:20

In Situ Soil Moisture Sensors in Undisturbed Soils

Published on: November 18, 2022

7.9K