Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Esophageal cancer recurrence after multimodality therapy: analysis of patterns and implications on long-term survival.

Journal of thoracic disease·2026
Same author

Robotic transgastric local resection of endoscopically unresectable gastroesophageal junction benign/low-grade lesions.

JTCVS techniques·2026
Same author

The additive effect of high-risk tumor features on long-term survival and recurrence in pathologic stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same author

The 2026 American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) expert consensus document: Surgical management of primary chest wall malignancies.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same author

Pulmonary mucormycosis: outcomes by treatment modality and underlying comorbidity.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

FDG-PET/CT SUVmax Predicts Recurrence Risk of Resected Pleuropulmonary Solitary Fibrous Tumors.

JTO clinical and research reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Generation of Comprehensive Thoracic Oncology Database - Tool for Translational Research
11:18

Generation of Comprehensive Thoracic Oncology Database - Tool for Translational Research

Published on: January 22, 2011

16.6K

Comparison of Two National Databases for General Thoracic Surgery.

Mark S Allen1, Shanda Blackmon1, Francis C Nichols1

  • 1Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
|August 31, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Partial sampling databases like ACS NSQIP are less effective for specific thoracic surgery quality improvement than comprehensive STS data. Comprehensive databases are crucial for accurate surgical outcome measurement and national comparisons.

More Related Videos

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

863
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Generation of Comprehensive Thoracic Oncology Database - Tool for Translational Research
11:18

Generation of Comprehensive Thoracic Oncology Database - Tool for Translational Research

Published on: January 22, 2011

16.6K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

863
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Health Services Research
  • Surgical Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of surgical outcomes is vital for improving patient care.
  • The study compares the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) sampling technique with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) comprehensive database.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if the ACS NSQIP sampling method is as effective and accurate as the STS comprehensive database for general thoracic surgery outcomes.
  • To evaluate the reliability of different database methodologies for quality improvement initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • Data from ACS NSQIP and STS databases for 2012 were collected by a single abstractor at one institution.
  • Deidentified data on demographics, preoperative risk factors, mortality, and morbidity were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • The STS database captured 100% of operations (1,595), while ACS NSQIP captured 19.3% (308).
  • Postoperative events were recorded in 30.1% of STS operations versus 17.2% of ACS NSQIP operations.
  • ACS NSQIP showed significant data errors for specific operations, under- or overestimating complication rates (e.g., pneumonia in lobectomy and esophagectomy).

Conclusions:

  • Partial sampling databases (ACS NSQIP) are insufficient for detailed quality improvement in specific thoracic surgical operations.
  • Comprehensive databases like the STS database are essential for meaningful quality assessment and improvement.
  • National comparisons of thoracic surgical outcomes using partial databases require cautious interpretation.