Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.5K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.5K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.7K
2.7K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

9.4K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
9.4K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.8K
2.8K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

3.2K
3.2K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

10.8K
10.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional network activation during a subtraction task.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Sex-specific cardiometabolic phenotypes in MASLD: 3PM-centric stratification and trajectory mapping for proactive risk assessment.

The EPMA journal·2026
Same author

Food-sensitized children with juvenile colorectal polyps exhibit a distinct mucosal and fecal microbial signature associated with inflammation.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Comparing statistical 'phenomic prediction' models for remote-sensing-based phenotyping of maize susceptibility to common rust.

Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Host transcriptional and microbiome metatranscriptomic changes in soybean plants carrying the insect-pathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana as an endophyte.

Journal of invertebrate pathology·2026
Same author

A principal component entropy metric for assessing global synchronicity in EEG signals.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Phenotypic plasticity trade-offs in an age-structured model of bacterial growth under stress.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Intraspecific interactions facilitate mutualism across multilayer networks under weak selection.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

A two-species competition model on a compact metric graph for the invasion and competition of Aedes Aegypti and Aedes Albopictus mosquitoes in Florida.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Superinfection and the hypnozoite reservoir for Plasmodium vivax: a multitype branching process approximation.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Superinfection and the hypnozoite reservoir for Plasmodium vivax: a general framework.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Stoichiometric balance and sustained rhythms.

Journal of mathematical biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Creating Highly Specific Chemically Induced Protein Dimerization Systems by Stepwise Phage Selection of a Combinatorial Single-Domain Antibody Library
10:17

Creating Highly Specific Chemically Induced Protein Dimerization Systems by Stepwise Phage Selection of a Combinatorial Single-Domain Antibody Library

Published on: January 14, 2020

8.3K

Cooperative binding: a multiple personality.

Johannes W R Martini1,2,3, Luis Diambra4, Michael Habeck5,6

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany. jmartin2@gwdg.de.

Journal of Mathematical Biology
|August 31, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cooperative binding definitions vary, with no two fully coinciding. This study clarifies these differences, questioning if macroscopic binding isotherms alone can distinguish positive from negative cooperativity in biological systems.

Keywords:
82B0582B2092C0592C4092E99

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes
07:22

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes

Published on: January 12, 2024

4.9K
Fluorescence Anisotropy as a Tool to Study Protein-protein Interactions
10:44

Fluorescence Anisotropy as a Tool to Study Protein-protein Interactions

Published on: October 21, 2016

31.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Creating Highly Specific Chemically Induced Protein Dimerization Systems by Stepwise Phage Selection of a Combinatorial Single-Domain Antibody Library
10:17

Creating Highly Specific Chemically Induced Protein Dimerization Systems by Stepwise Phage Selection of a Combinatorial Single-Domain Antibody Library

Published on: January 14, 2020

8.3K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes
07:22

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Biophysical Assays for Characterizing PROTACS Ternary Complexes

Published on: January 12, 2024

4.9K
Fluorescence Anisotropy as a Tool to Study Protein-protein Interactions
10:44

Fluorescence Anisotropy as a Tool to Study Protein-protein Interactions

Published on: October 21, 2016

31.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Chemical Physics

Background:

  • Cooperative binding is characterized by multiple definitions and properties.
  • Commonly used metrics include the Hill coefficient and sigmoidal titration curves.
  • Changes in ligand affinity and binding polynomial roots also describe cooperativity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the relationships between different properties used to define cooperative binding.
  • To highlight differences between various cooperativity-characterizing properties.
  • To question the validity of distinguishing positive and negative cooperativity based solely on macroscopic binding isotherms.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of cooperative binding using the most general model based on the grand canonical partition function.
  • Presentation of examples to illustrate differences in cooperativity properties.
  • Mathematical analysis of binding curves.

Main Results:

  • The study found that no two presented definitions of cooperativity fully coincide.
  • Significant differences exist between various properties used to characterize cooperativity.
  • The research highlights potential ambiguities in current definitions.

Conclusions:

  • Clearer communication regarding specific types of cooperativity is essential for scientists studying biological systems.
  • Distinguishing between positive and negative cooperativity based solely on macroscopic binding isotherms may be problematic.
  • Standardizing definitions and communication around cooperative binding is recommended to avoid misunderstandings.