Comparative Evaluation of Broad-Panel PCR Assays for the Detection of Gastrointestinal Pathogens in Pediatric

Zhengming Gu1, Haiqing Zhu1, Alicia Rodriguez1

  • 1Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.

Insights

Broadly multiplexed PCR assays effectively diagnose gastrointestinal infections in immunocompromised children. Performance of BioFire and Luminex systems was comparable for detecting common pathogens.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical microbiology
  • Molecular diagnostics
  • Pediatric oncology

Background:

  • Gastrointestinal infections pose significant risks for immunocompromised patients, particularly those undergoing cancer treatment.
  • Broadly multiplexed molecular amplification assays offer rapid and comprehensive pathogen detection but require performance evaluation in specific patient populations.
  • Limited data exist comparing the diagnostic accuracy of different multiplexed PCR systems in immunocompromised pediatric oncology patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of two broadly multiplexed PCR assays (BioFire and Luminex) for diagnosing gastrointestinal infections in immunocompromised pediatric oncology patients.
  • To evaluate the diagnostic yield of these investigational assays against established laboratory methods, including in-house PCR, culture, and antigen detection.

Main Methods:

  • A total of 436 stool samples were collected from 199 immunocompromised pediatric oncology patients.
  • Samples were tested in parallel using premarket versions of the BioFire and Luminex multiplexed PCR assays.
  • Results were compared with laboratory-developed molecular assays, culture, and antigen detection for the first episode per patient.

Main Results:

  • Overall performance of the BioFire and Luminex assays was comparable, detecting 94 and 99 positive cases, respectively (P = 0.34).
  • Significant differences were observed for specific analytes: Luminex detected more Clostridium difficile (60 vs. 51, P = 0.01) and norovirus (38 vs. 28, P = 0.002) cases than BioFire.
  • In-house PCR detected more astrovirus and adenovirus cases than BioFire, and more adenovirus cases than Luminex.

Conclusions:

  • Broadly multiplexed PCR assays are effective tools for identifying a range of gastrointestinal pathogens in pediatric oncology patients.
  • The performance of the BioFire and Luminex multiplexed PCR systems is comparable overall, with some analyte-specific variations.
  • These molecular assays provide a valuable diagnostic approach for managing gastrointestinal infections in this vulnerable patient group.

Related Concept Videos