Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography
Olivier Ghekiere1,2,3, Willem Dewilde4, Michel Bellekens5
1Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Chrétien (CHC), Rue de Hesbaye 75, Liège, 4000, Belgium. olivierghekiere@gmail.com.
Insights
Quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and quantitative catheter coronary angiography (QCA) poorly predict the hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis (ICAS). Additional functional evaluation is required to guide treatment decisions for these lesions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention
- Interventional Cardiology
- Radiology
Background:
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is crucial for guiding treatment in intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis (ICAS).
- Visual assessment of stenosis severity by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) does not reliably correlate with functional significance.
- There is a need for additional angiographic descriptors to accurately assess the hemodynamic significance of ICAS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate quantitative stenosis analysis and plaque descriptors from CCTA in predicting the hemodynamic significance of ICAS.
- To compare the predictive value of CCTA descriptors with quantitative catheter coronary angiography (QCA).
Main Methods:
- Sixty-five patients with 76 ICAS (40-70% stenosis on CCTA) underwent both CCTA and QCA.
- CCTA plaque descriptors included calcification extent, composition, minimal lumen diameter (MLD), and area.
- FFR was measured in 52 lesions; diagnostic values of CCTA and QCA descriptors for FFR ≤ 0.80 were calculated.
Main Results:
- Significant correlations were found between CCTA and QCA for MLD and diameter stenosis percentage (Ds %) (p < 0.001).
- FFR ≤ 0.80 was observed in 33% of lesions.
- Calcification extent and plaque composition did not correlate with hemodynamic significance. Best CCTA predictors for FFR ≤ 0.80 were MLD ≤ 1.35 mm and minimal lumen area ≤ 2.3 mm², while QCA best predictor was MLD ≤ 1.1 mm.
Conclusions:
- Quantitative CCTA and QCA demonstrate poor predictive ability for the hemodynamic significance of ICAS.
- CCTA appears to offer higher sensitivity than QCA in predicting hemodynamic significance.
- Functional evaluation remains essential for guiding revascularization decisions in intermediate-grade coronary stenoses.
Abstract:
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) during invasive coronary angiography has become an established tool for guiding treatment. However, only one-third of intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis (ICAS) are hemodynamically significant and require coronary revascularization. Additionally, the severity of stenosis visually established by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) does not reliably correlate with the functional severity. Therefore, additional angiographic morphologic descriptors affecting hemodynamic significance are required. To evaluate quantitative stenosis analysis and plaque descriptors by CCTA in predicting the hemodynamic significance of ICAS and to compare it with quantitative catheter coronary angiography (QCA). QCA was performed in 65 patients (mean age 63 ± 9 years; 47 men) with 76 ICAS (40-70%) on CCTA. Plaque descriptors were determined including circumferential extent of calcification, plaque composition, minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and area, diameter stenosis percentage (Ds %), area stenosis percentage and stenosis length on CCTA. MLD and Ds % were also analyzed on QCA. FFR was measured on 52 ICAS lesions on CCTA and QCA. The diagnostic values of the best CCTA and QCA descriptors were calculated for ICAS with FFR ≤ 0.80. Of the 76 ICAS on CCTA, 52 (68%) had a Ds % between 40 and 70% on QCA. Significant intertechnique correlations were found between CCTA and QCA for MLD and Ds % (p < 0.001). In 17 (33%) of the 52 ICAS lesions on QCA, FFR values were ≤ 0.80. Calcification circumference extent (p = 0.50) and plaque composition assessment (p = 0.59) did not correlate with the hemodynamic significance. Best predictors for FFR ≤ 0.80 stenosis were ≤ 1.35 mm MLD (82% sensitivity, 66% specificity), and ≤ 2.3 mm(²) minimal lumen area (88% sensitivity, 60% specificity) on CCTA, and ≤ 1.1 mm MLD (59% sensitivity, 77% specificity) on QCA. Quantitative CCTA and QCA poorly predict hemodynamic significance of ICAS, though CCTA seems to have a better sensitivity than QCA. In this range of stenoses, additional functional evaluation is required.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...

