Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metal-NO<sub>2</sub> Anchored Graphene Single-Atom Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction: A Density Functional Theory Study.

Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry·2026
Same author

Comparative Literature Review of Ergonomic and Safety Approaches in Agricultural Tools.

Journal of agromedicine·2026
Same author

Spin-Phonon Coupling and Magnetic Ordering in Layered CrPS<sub>4</sub>.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

The Influence of workload measures by weight, repetition and height during one-handed handling.

International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE·2025
Same author

Quantum-Hall spectroscopy of elliptically deformed graphene nanobubble qubits.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2025
Same author

Timing evaluation of one-handed handling based on muscular activity.

International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.4K

Quantitative comparison of marker attachment methods for hand motion analysis.

Kyung-Sun Lee1, Myung-Chul Jung

  • 1a Suncheon Jeil College , Republic of Korea.

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics : JOSE
|September 2, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

For static kinematic evaluation, using one marker per joint is best for comfort and ease. For dynamic evaluations, three markers per segment or cluster markers minimize skin movement errors.

Keywords:
anglehand biomechanicsmarker attachment methodmotion analysis

More Related Videos

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

9.0K
Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact
10:07

Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact

Published on: February 10, 2015

20.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.4K
Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

9.0K
Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact
10:07

Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact

Published on: February 10, 2015

20.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Motion Analysis
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Accurate kinematic evaluation is crucial for understanding human movement.
  • Marker attachment methods can influence the reliability of motion capture data.
  • Optimizing marker placement is essential for precise kinematic analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare and quantify angle differences among various marker attachment methods for kinematic evaluation.
  • To determine the most reliable marker attachment strategies for both static and dynamic assessments.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for marker placement in motion analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Static evaluation involved a hand mock-up with different marker attachment methods.
  • Dynamic evaluation utilized a gripping task with participants.
  • Statistical analysis was performed to assess the significance of angle differences and marker set effects.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant angle difference was found between marker attachment methods and the hand mock-up in static evaluation.
  • The marker set had a significant effect (p < .049) on dynamic evaluation results.
  • Static evaluation showed minimal differences, while dynamic evaluation was sensitive to marker placement variations.

Conclusions:

  • One marker per joint is recommended for static kinematic evaluation due to comfort and ease of consistent placement.
  • For dynamic kinematic evaluation, employing three markers per segment or cluster markers is advised to mitigate skin movement artifacts.
  • The findings guide optimal marker attachment strategies for improved accuracy in biomechanical studies.