Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

52.6K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
52.6K
Equilibrium and Balance01:15

Equilibrium and Balance

8.0K
The inner ear assumes dual functionalities of auditory perception and equilibrium maintenance. The vestibule is the organ responsible for balance. This organ contains mechanoreceptors, specifically hair cells, endowed with stereocilia, which aid in deciphering information regarding the position and motion of our heads. Two intrinsic components, the utricle and saccule, help perceive head position, while the semicircular canals track head movement. Neurological messages initiated in the...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rheumatological Manifestations of Systemic Amyloidosis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study From a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Clinical Profile of Giant Cell Arteritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Gut and oral microbiota characterized in systemic lupus erythematosus patients from India: A pilot study.

Lupus·2026
Same author

Outcome predictors of systemic lupus erythematosus requiring admission to the intensive care unit.

World journal of critical care medicine·2025
Same author

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Adalimumab Injection with Innovator Adalimumab in Subjects with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis.

The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India·2025
Same author

A Clinical Case Report of Deficiency of Adenosine Deaminase 2 Syndrome (DADA 2) Presenting as a Brachial Artery Aneurysm.

Mediterranean journal of rheumatology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K

Nasalance in Cochlear Implantees.

Swapna Sebastian1, N Sreedevi2, Anjali Lepcha1

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology
|September 3, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cochlear implants improve speech nasality in children with profound hearing loss compared to hearing aids, but do not fully normalize speech. Further research is needed to optimize outcomes for cochlear implant users.

Keywords:
Cochlear ImplantationHearing Aid UsersHearing LossNasal Air PressureSpeech Intelligibility

More Related Videos

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

5.2K
Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K
Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

5.2K
Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Audiology
  • Otolaryngology

Background:

  • Congenital profound hearing loss significantly impacts speech intelligibility and often results in hypernasality.
  • Cochlear implants offer advanced auditory information compared to traditional hearing aids.
  • Understanding nasality in hearing-impaired children is crucial for speech development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the percentage of nasality in the speech of children using cochlear implants versus hearing aids.
  • To evaluate speech nasality in cochlear implant users against children with normal hearing.
  • To assess the effectiveness of cochlear implants in reducing hypernasality.

Main Methods:

  • Study included three groups: 12 children (4-10 years) with cochlear implants, 12 with hearing aids, and age/sex-matched normal-hearing controls.
  • All children had prelingual bilateral profound hearing loss and received at least one year of speech therapy.
  • Nasality was measured by calculating the percentage of nasalance using a specific oral-sound sentence.

Main Results:

  • Children using hearing aids exhibited a high percentage of nasalance.
  • Cochlear implant users showed significantly lower nasalance than hearing aid users.
  • However, the nasalance levels in cochlear implant users did not reach those of normal-hearing children.

Conclusions:

  • Cochlear implant users demonstrate superior speech quality compared to hearing aid users, with reduced nasality.
  • Speech acoustics in cochlear implant recipients still deviate from normal, indicating areas for improvement.
  • Further research should investigate the impact of age at implantation and implant laterality on nasality reduction.