Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

04:32
Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
Published on: December 20, 2024
995
Benefit From Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Objective and Subjective Evaluations
Hee-Sung Park1, Il Joon Moon2, Sun Hwa Jin1
1Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology
|September 3, 2015
Summary
Directional (DIR) hearing aid processing improved speech quality and reduced discomfort in noise, but objective and subjective results did not correlate. Individual factors did not predict DIR benefit.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Hearing Aid Technology
- Speech Processing
Background:
- Directional (DIR) processing in hearing aids aims to improve speech intelligibility in noisy environments.
- Evaluating DIR benefit requires both objective measures and subjective user feedback.
- Understanding individual factors influencing DIR benefit is crucial for hearing aid fitting.
Purpose of the Study:
- Compare the effectiveness of directional processing in two different hearing aids using objective and subjective methods.
- Assess the correlation between subjective and objective evaluations of DIR benefit.
- Identify individual factors that predict the benefit derived from DIR processing.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-six hearing aid users participated in the study.
- Objective evaluation used a modified Korean Hearing in Noise Test (K-HINT) in omnidirectional (OMNI) and DIR modes.
- Subjective evaluation involved questionnaires on speech quality (SQ) and discomfort in noise (DN).
Main Results:
- DIR processing showed objective benefits in K-HINT results (2.8 and 2.1 dB SNR).
- Subjective evaluations indicated better SQ and DN scores in DIR mode compared to OMNI mode.
- No statistically significant difference was found between the two hearing aids in DIR mode, nor did individual factors significantly influence DIR benefits.
Conclusions:
- DIR benefit is evident in both objective and subjective assessments.
- Subjective DIR benefit did not significantly correlate with objective K-HINT results.
- Predicting individual variations in perceptual DIR benefit remains challenging.

