Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test01:21

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

893
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a nonparametric test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the distributions of two independent samples. This test is designed specifically for two independent populations and has the following key requirements:
893
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

994
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
994
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

575
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
575
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.6K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.6K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

606
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
606
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A longitudinal investigation of school absenteeism and mental health challenges among Canadian children and youth in the COVID-19 context.

Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry·2025
Same author

Neural dynamics underlying the acquisition of distinct auditory category structures.

NeuroImage·2021
Same author

Exploring Explicit Learning Strategies: A Dissociative Framework for Research.

New ideas in psychology·2021
Same author

A Dissociative Framework for Understanding Same-Different Conceptualization.

Current opinion in behavioral sciences·2021
Same author

The impact of training methodology and representation on rule-based categorization: An fMRI study.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2021
Same author

Conceptual anchoring dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.1K

One Giant Leap for Categorizers: One Small Step for Categorization Theory.

J David Smith1, Shawn W Ell2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Plos One
|September 3, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Humans exhibit sudden psychological shifts during rule-based category learning, a process current computational models fail to replicate. New modeling approaches are needed to understand this explicit rule discovery.

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.9K
Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
05:35

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization

Published on: April 19, 2017

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.1K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.9K
Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
05:35

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization

Published on: April 19, 2017

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Human category learning involves distinct psychological transitions.
  • Understanding these transitions is crucial for a complete theory of categorization.
  • Current computational models struggle to account for observed human learning patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze psychological transitions in human rule-based category learning.
  • To evaluate the capacity of existing computational models to simulate these transitions.
  • To identify limitations in current models and propose future research directions.

Main Methods:

  • Employed analytic approaches to study human rule-based category learning.
  • Conducted extensive formal-modeling analyses of existing learning models.
  • Compared model predictions with observed human psychological transitions.

Main Results:

  • Confirmed qualitatively sudden psychological transitions during human rule learning.
  • Demonstrated that current gradient-descent models, including rule-based and exemplar models, cannot reproduce these transitions.
  • Identified the incremental algorithms in existing models as a key limitation.

Conclusions:

  • Existing computational models are inadequate for explaining human rule-based category learning.
  • Human rule learning does not follow a gradient-descent process.
  • Novel formal-modeling systems are required to accurately simulate human psychology in rule-based categorization tasks.