Long-Term Patient-Related and Lesion-Related Outcomes After Real-World Fractional Flow Reserve Use

Joon-Hyung Doh, Chang-Wook Nam, Bon-Kwon Koo1

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehang-ro, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea. bkkoo@snu.ac.kr.

Insights

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided decisions to defer stenting in coronary lesions show favorable long-term outcomes. However, diabetes and low FFR values (≤0.8) increase clinical event risk in deferred lesions.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Real-world long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve (FFR) use, including deferral decisions, remain under-evaluated in the era of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.
  • Assessing the impact of FFR-guided treatment strategies is crucial for optimizing patient care in coronary artery disease.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing FFR measurement for de novo coronary lesions.
  • To determine the impact of FFR-guided treatment strategies (stenting vs. deferral) on major adverse cardiac events and target-lesion related events.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 1294 patients with de novo coronary lesions underwent FFR measurement.
  • Lesions were categorized as FFR-deferred or FFR-stented based on treatment decisions post-FFR measurement.
  • Clinical outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events and target-lesion related events, were assessed over a 5-year follow-up period.

Main Results:

  • Mean FFR was 0.80 ± 0.12, with 44.7% of lesions having an FFR ≤0.8.
  • Five-year cumulative event rates were: all-cause death 6.3%, myocardial infarction 1.5%, and any revascularization 12.5%.
  • Deferred lesions with FFR ≤0.8 exhibited a higher risk of 5-year target-lesion related events (21.2%) compared to those with FFR >0.8 (6.6%). Diabetes and FFR ≤0.8 were independent predictors for 1-year and delayed events, respectively.

Conclusions:

  • Deferral of stenting based on FFR measurements is associated with favorable long-term clinical outcomes.
  • The presence of diabetes and an FFR value of ≤0.8 are significant risk factors for adverse clinical events in deferred lesions.
  • FFR remains a valuable tool for guiding revascularization decisions, but patient-specific factors like diabetes must be considered.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos