Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
Transmission characteristics of MERS and SARS in the healthcare setting: a comparative study
Gerardo Chowell1,2, Fatima Abdirizak3, Sunmi Lee4
1School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. gchowell@gsu.edu.
Background:
The Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus has caused recurrent outbreaks in the Arabian Peninsula since 2012. Although MERS has low overall human-to-human transmission potential, there is occasional amplification in the healthcare setting, a pattern reminiscent of the dynamics of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreaks in 2003. Here we provide a head-to-head comparison of exposure patterns and transmission dynamics of large hospital clusters of MERS and SARS, including the most recent South Korean outbreak of MERS in 2015.
Methods:
To assess the unexpected nature of the recent South Korean nosocomial outbreak of MERS and estimate the probability of future large hospital clusters, we compared exposure and transmission patterns for previously reported hospital clusters of MERS and SARS, based on individual-level data and transmission tree information. We carried out simulations of nosocomial outbreaks of MERS and SARS using branching process models rooted in transmission tree data, and inferred the probability and characteristics of large outbreaks.
Results:
A significant fraction of MERS cases were linked to the healthcare setting, ranging from 43.5 % for the nosocomial outbreak in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in 2014 to 100 % for both the outbreak in Al-Hasa, Saudi Arabia, in 2013 and the outbreak in South Korea in 2015. Both MERS and SARS nosocomial outbreaks are characterized by early nosocomial super-spreading events, with the reproduction number dropping below 1 within three to five disease generations. There was a systematic difference in the exposure patterns of MERS and SARS: a majority of MERS cases occurred among patients who sought care in the same facilities as the index case, whereas there was a greater concentration of SARS cases among healthcare workers throughout the outbreak. Exposure patterns differed slightly by disease generation, however, especially for SARS. Moreover, the distributions of secondary cases per single primary case varied highly across individual hospital outbreaks (Kruskal-Wallis test; P < 0.0001), with significantly higher transmission heterogeneity in the distribution of secondary cases for MERS than SARS. Simulations indicate a 2-fold higher probability of occurrence of large outbreaks (>100 cases) for SARS than MERS (2 % versus 1 %); however, owing to higher transmission heterogeneity, the largest outbreaks of MERS are characterized by sharper incidence peaks. The probability of occurrence of MERS outbreaks larger than the South Korean cluster (n = 186) is of the order of 1 %.
Conclusions:
Our study suggests that the South Korean outbreak followed a similar progression to previously described hospital clusters involving coronaviruses, with early super-spreading events generating a disproportionately large number of secondary infections, and the transmission potential diminishing greatly in subsequent generations. Differences in relative exposure patterns and transmission heterogeneity of MERS and SARS could point to changes in hospital practices since 2003 or differences in transmission mechanisms of these coronaviruses.
Insights
Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreaks show similar early super-spreading events in hospitals. MERS outbreaks exhibit higher transmission heterogeneity, leading to sharper incidence peaks despite a lower probability of large outbreaks compared to SARS.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health
Background:
- Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) has caused recurrent outbreaks since 2012.
- MERS-CoV exhibits low human-to-human transmission but can amplify in healthcare settings, similar to SARS outbreaks in 2003.
- This study compares MERS and SARS hospital clusters, including the 2015 South Korean MERS outbreak.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare exposure patterns and transmission dynamics of large hospital clusters of MERS and SARS.
- To assess the South Korean MERS outbreak and estimate the probability of future large hospital clusters.
- To infer the probability and characteristics of large nosocomial outbreaks using simulations.
Main Methods:
- Compared exposure and transmission patterns of MERS and SARS hospital clusters using individual-level data and transmission trees.
- Conducted simulations of nosocomial outbreaks using branching process models.
- Inferred outbreak probabilities and characteristics based on transmission tree data.
Main Results:
- A significant fraction of MERS cases (43.5%-100%) were healthcare-associated.
- Both MERS and SARS outbreaks featured early super-spreading events, with reproduction numbers dropping below 1 within 3-5 generations.
- MERS outbreaks showed higher transmission heterogeneity and sharper incidence peaks than SARS, with a 1% probability of exceeding 100 cases, versus 2% for SARS.
Conclusions:
- The South Korean MERS outbreak followed patterns of early super-spreading events seen in other coronavirus hospital clusters.
- Differences in MERS and SARS exposure patterns and transmission heterogeneity may reflect changes in hospital practices or distinct viral transmission mechanisms.
- Hospital practices and coronavirus transmission mechanisms require further investigation to mitigate future outbreaks.
More Related Videos
09:02Infection of Primary Nasal Epithelial Cells Grown at an Air-Liquid Interface to Characterize Human Coronavirus-Host Interactions
Published on: September 22, 2023
08:40Production of Pseudotyped Particles to Study Highly Pathogenic Coronaviruses in a Biosafety Level 2 Setting
Published on: March 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...