Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Calcification of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Imaging of Aortic Calcification and Inflammation
Published on: May 31, 2016
Doppler ultrasound and calcification score: improving vascular access surveillance
Maria Guedes Marques1, Carlos Botelho1, Pedro Maia1
1a Vascular Access Center of Nephrocare Coimbra , Coimbra , Portugal .
Insights
A simple vascular calcification score (SVCS) is linked to lower dialysis access flow (Qa), suggesting it can help predict vascular access issues. This score may improve risk stratification for hemodialysis patients.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Vascular Surgery
- Radiology
Background:
- Vascular access (VA) dysfunction, primarily due to thrombosis from neointimal hyperplasia, significantly increases morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients.
- Systemic factors like atherosclerosis, inflammation, and calcification contribute to VA failure, necessitating improved surveillance strategies.
- A simple vascular calcification score (SVCS) has been developed to predict vascular calcification and arterial stiffness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the role of systemic factors, particularly the simple vascular calcification score (SVCS), in influencing blood access flow (Qa).
- To assess the predictive power of SVCS for detecting stenosis in vascular access for hemodialysis.
Main Methods:
- A transversal study involving 50 patients undergoing hemodialysis.
- Blood access flow (Qa) was measured using the Blood Temperature Monitor (BTM) and Doppler methods.
- Clinical, laboratory, and radiological variables, including SVCS, were recorded, and non-parametric tests were used to analyze their association with Qa.
Main Results:
- Pearson's correlation between DU-Qa and TD-Qa was 0.851 (p<0.001).
- DU-Qa showed significant variation with age, VA type, SVCS, intra-access arterial pressure, and time on dialysis.
- BTM-Qa varied significantly with diabetes status, age, first VA status, intra-access arterial pressure, and dialysis time; gender, hypertension, and analytical parameters did not significantly affect flow values.
Conclusions:
- A higher SVCS was associated with lower direct ultrasound (DU)-measured access flow (Qa), indicating a potential advantage of this method for assessing vascular access.
- The simple vascular calcification score (SVCS) can be a valuable tool for risk stratification and guiding new surveillance recommendations for hemodialysis vascular access.
Aim:
Vascular access (VA) dysfunction limits hemodialysis delivery, which increases morbidity and mortality. The most com mon cause of VA failure is thrombosis, due to flow limiting stenosis resulting from neointimal hyperplasia. This occurs not only due to hemodynamic factors but also by systemic ones related to vascular atherosclerosis, inflammation and calcification, which has developed a simple vascular calcification score (SVCS) predictor of vascular calcification and arterial stiffness. The NKF-K/DOQ recommends several diagnostic procedures for VA surveillance. Blood access flow (Qa) has predictive power for the detection of stenosis. Our aim was to evaluate the role of systemic factors, especially SCVS, on Qa.
Material And Methods:
Transversal study in 50 patients. Qa value was obtained with Blood Temperature Monitor and Doppler method. Pearson coefficient evaluated correlation between them. Clinical, lab and radiological variables were recorded and non-parametric tests evaluated how both Qa varied with them.
Results:
Pearson's corelation between DU-Qa and TD-Qa was 0.851 (p-value <0.001). DU-Qa varied significantly with age (p = 0.012), VA type (p = 0.021), SCVS (p = 0.030), intra-access arterial pressure (p = 0.015) and time on dialysis (p = 0.002). BTM-Qa varied significantly with diabetes status (p = 0.027), age (p = 0.017), first VA status (p = 0.036), intra-access arterial pressure (p = 0.028) and dialysis time (p = 0.001). Nevertheless, gender, hypertensive status and analitical parameters did not change the flow values.
Conclusion:
Higher SVCS was associated only with lower DU-Qas, giving this method an advantage towards the indirect one. Additionally, a simple method like SVCS may be used to guide new surveillance recommendations accordingly to risk stratification.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

