Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Stability and Structure of Bat Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I with Heterologous β2-Microglobulin
Published on: March 10, 2021
Development and characterization of an αvβ6-specific diabody and a disulfide-stabilized αvβ6-specific cys-diabody
Jason B White1, David L Boucher1, Kirstin A Zettlitz2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Introduction:
This work describes the development and characterization of two antibody fragments that specifically target the α(v)β(6) integrin, a non-covalent diabody and a disulfide-stabilized cys-diabody. The diabodies were analyzed for their ability to bind both immobilized and cell surface-bound α(v)β(6). Radiolabeling was done using non-site-specific and site-specific conjugation approaches with N-succinimidyl 4-[(18)F]fluorobenzoate ([(18)F]-SFB) and the bifunctional chelator 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-triacetic acid maleimide (NOTA-maleimide) and copper-64 ([(64)Cu]), respectively. The affects of each radiolabeling method on RCY, RCP, and immunoreactivity were analyzed for the [(18)F]-FB-α(v)β(6) diabody, [(18)F]-FB-α(v)β(6) cys-diabody, and the [(64)Cu]-NOTA-α(v)β(6) cys-diabody.
Methods:
Diabodies were constructed from the variable domains of the humanized 6.3G9 anti-α(v)β(6) intact antibody. The anti-α(v(β(6) cys-diabody was engineered with C-terminal cysteines to enable covalent dimerization and site-specific modification. Biochemical characterization included SDS-PAGE, Western blot, and electrospray ionization to confirm MW, and flow cytometry and ELISA experiments were used to determine binding affinity and specificity to α(v)β(6). The diabodies were radiolabeled with [(18)F]-SFB and in addition, the anti-α(v)β(6) cys-diabody was also radiolabeled site-specifically using NOTA-maleimide and [(64)Cu]. Immunoreactivities were confirmed using in vitro cell binding to DX3Puroβ(6) (α(v)β(6)+) and DX3Puro (α(v)β(6)-)cell lines.
Results:
The diabodies were purified from cell culture supernatants with purities >98%. Subnanomolar binding affinity towards αvβ6 was confirmed by ELISA (diabody IC(50)=0.8 nM, cys-diabody IC(50)=0.6 nM) and flow cytometry revealed high specificity only to the DX3Puroβ(6) cell line for both diabodies. RCYs were 22.6%±3.6% for the [(18)F]-FB-α(v)β(6) diabody, 8.3%±1.7% for the [(18)F]-FB-α(v)β(6) cys-diabody and 43.5%±5.5% for the [(64)Cu]-NOTA-α(v)β(6) cys-diabody. In vitro cell binding assays revealed excellent specificity and retention of immunoreactivity ([(18)F]-FB-α(v)β(6) diabody=58.7%±6.7%, [(18)F]-FB-α(v)β(6) cys-diabody=80.4%±4.4%, [(64)Cu]-NOTA-α(v)β(6) cys-diabody=59.4%±0.6%) regardless of the radiolabeling method used.
Conclusions:
Two novel diabodies with excellent binding affinity and specificity for the α(v)β(6) integrin in vitro were developed. Radiolabeling of the diabodies with fluorine-18 ([(18)F]) and [(64)Cu] revealed advantages and disadvantages with regards to methodologies and RCYs, however immunoreactivities were well preserved regardless of radiolabeling approach.
Related Concept Videos
Antibody Structure
Antibodies, also known as immunoglobulins (Ig), are essential players of the adaptive immune system. These antigen-binding proteins are produced by B cells and make up 20 percent of the total blood plasma by weight. In mammals, antibodies fall into five different classes, which each elicits a different biological response upon antigen binding.
The Y-Shaped Structure of Antibodies Consists of Four Polypeptide Chains
Antibodies consist of four polypeptide chains: two identical heavy...
Antibody Structure

