Outcomes of Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices Undergoing Mesenteric Angiography for Gastrointestinal

Amar Mehta1, Stephanie Kim1, Osman Ahmed1

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637.

Insights

Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) experiencing gastrointestinal bleeding had worse outcomes. They required more interventions and had higher mortality compared to controls, indicating clinical failure.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a serious complication in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).
  • Anticoagulation therapy in LVAD patients can increase bleeding risk.
  • Mesenteric angiography is a diagnostic tool for GI bleeding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare clinical success rates between LVAD patients and controls undergoing mesenteric angiography for GI bleeding.
  • To evaluate the need for subsequent interventions and mortality in these patient groups.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 48 patients (24 LVAD, 24 control) with GI bleeding assessed by angiography.
  • Statistical analysis using chi-squared and t tests.
  • Comparison of outcomes including bleeding detection, interventions, and mortality.

Main Results:

  • Lower detection rate of bleeding on angiography in LVAD patients (8.3% vs 33.3%).
  • Higher rates of clinical failure (33.3% vs 87.5%) and repeat angiography within 14 days (29.2% vs 4.5%) in LVAD patients.
  • Increased in-hospital mortality (16.7% vs 4.2%) for LVAD patients.

Conclusions:

  • Patients with LVADs experiencing GI bleeding demonstrate a higher rate of clinical failure.
  • LVAD patients require more frequent repeat angiography and subsequent interventions.
  • Higher mortality rates underscore the severity of GI bleeding in LVAD recipients.
Abstract