Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

1.7K
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
1.7K
Vision01:24

Vision

61.6K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
61.6K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.7K
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

1.8K
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
1.8K
Tactile and Chemical Senses01:27

Tactile and Chemical Senses

1.3K
Tactile senses encompass touch, temperature, and pain, each mediated by specific receptors. Touch receptors detect mechanical energy or pressure against the skin. Sensory fibers from these receptors enter the spinal cord and relay information to the brain stem. Here, most fibers cross over to the opposite side of the brain. The touch information then moves to the thalamus, which projects a map of the body's surface onto the somatosensory areas of the parietal lobes in the cerebral cortex.
1.3K
Prosopagnosia01:24

Prosopagnosia

1.1K
Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human gloss perception reproduced by tiny neural networks.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

The visual perception of outdoor angular spatial relationships.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

The visual perception of relative mass from object collisions.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

The identification of materials from patterns of fluid flow.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Visual sensitivity to irregularities in periodic tiling patterns.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Gloss discrimination: Toward an image-based perceptual model.

Journal of vision·2025
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.3K

Aging and solid shape recognition: Vision and haptics.

J Farley Norman1, Jacob R Cheeseman1, Olivia C Adkins1

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 42101-2030, United States.

Vision Research
|September 7, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Object recognition differs between vision and touch. While visual recognition excels with repeated exposure and declines with age, haptic recognition is less accurate but age-independent, suggesting distinct processing pathways for shape perception.

Keywords:
AgingHapticsShape recognitionVision

More Related Videos

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.4K
Design and Evaluation of Smart Glasses for Food Intake and Physical Activity Classification
07:47

Design and Evaluation of Smart Glasses for Food Intake and Physical Activity Classification

Published on: February 14, 2018

12.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.3K
Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.4K
Design and Evaluation of Smart Glasses for Food Intake and Physical Activity Classification
07:47

Design and Evaluation of Smart Glasses for Food Intake and Physical Activity Classification

Published on: February 14, 2018

12.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Object recognition is crucial for daily functioning.
  • Understanding how sensory modalities (vision, touch) process object shape is vital.
  • The impact of aging on sensory-based object recognition requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare visual and haptic recognition of natural object shapes in younger and older adults.
  • To investigate the influence of object presentation frequency and time delays on recognition memory.
  • To determine if aging affects visual versus haptic shape recognition differently.

Main Methods:

  • 114 younger and older adults participated in three experiments.
  • Participants recognized bell peppers (Capsicum annuum) using either vision or haptics.
  • Recognition memory was tested immediately, or after 10-20 min delays, with varying object presentation frequencies.

Main Results:

  • Younger adults showed identical visual and haptic recognition with single object presentations.
  • Vision became superior to haptics with multiple presentations.
  • No significant differences between vision and haptics were found after time delays.
  • Older adults exhibited significantly poorer visual shape recognition compared to younger adults.
  • Haptic shape recognition showed no significant age-related decline.

Conclusions:

  • Visual and haptic shape recognition are distinct processes.
  • Visual recognition is susceptible to aging, whereas haptic recognition is not.
  • Haptic recognition may be more robust in older adults for natural object shapes.