Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...

Types of Hypothesis Testing

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...

What is a Hypothesis?

What is a Hypothesis?

A hypothesis can be a simple sentence or statement about a property or any phenomenon observed or predicted for a population. It is usually a claim about a property of the population. It can be stated for any field observations or experiments. A hypothesis statement cannot be said to be right or wrong as it is merely a statement. It needs to be tested through an elaborate data collection process and an appropriate statistical test. A hypothesis should be a general but not a vague...

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Identifying a nasal gene expression signature associated with hyperinflation and treatment response in severe COPD.

Scientific reports·2020

Same author

Phenotypic and functional translation of IL1RL1 locus polymorphisms in lung tissue and asthmatic airway epithelium.

JCI insight·2020

Same author

Integrated proteogenomic approach identifying a protein signature of COPD and a new splice variant of SORBS1.

Thorax·2020

Same author

IL1RL1 gene variations are associated with asthma exacerbations in children and adolescents using inhaled corticosteroids.

Allergy·2019

Same author

Nasal gene expression changes with inhaled corticosteroid treatment in asthma.

Allergy·2019

Same author

Differential lung tissue gene expression in males and females: implications for the susceptibility to develop COPD.

The European respiratory journal·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Published on: January 25, 2018

Revisiting the Dutch hypothesis.

Dirkje S Postma¹, Scott T Weiss², Maarten van den Berge¹

¹University of Groningen, Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

|September 8, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The Dutch hypothesis proposed in 1961 that genetics and environment influence obstructive airway diseases like asthma and COPD. Detailed patient phenotyping remains crucial for understanding and managing these complex conditions.

Keywords:

Asthma Dutch hypothesis allergy chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hyperresponsiveness

More Related Videos

A Method to Test the Effect of Environmental Cues on Mating Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

A Method to Test the Effect of Environmental Cues on Mating Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: July 17, 2017

High-throughput Analysis of Locomotor Behavior in the Drosophila Island Assay

High-throughput Analysis of Locomotor Behavior in the Drosophila Island Assay

Published on: November 5, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Published on: January 25, 2018

A Method to Test the Effect of Environmental Cues on Mating Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

A Method to Test the Effect of Environmental Cues on Mating Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: July 17, 2017

High-throughput Analysis of Locomotor Behavior in the Drosophila Island Assay

High-throughput Analysis of Locomotor Behavior in the Drosophila Island Assay

Published on: November 5, 2017

Area of Science:

Pulmonary Medicine
Respiratory Research
Genetics and Environment in Airway Disease

Background:

The Dutch hypothesis, proposed in 1961, predated modern techniques like genomics and advanced imaging.
It suggested that genetic and environmental factors influence the development of obstructive airway diseases.

Purpose of the Study:

To re-evaluate the enduring relevance of the Dutch hypothesis in light of contemporary research.
To emphasize the importance of detailed patient phenotyping for understanding asthma and COPD heterogeneity.

Main Methods:

Historical review of the Dutch hypothesis and its initial context.
Analysis of current research trends in asthma and COPD phenotyping.
Discussion of the integration of advanced scientific techniques with the hypothesis's core tenets.

Main Results:

The Dutch hypothesis accurately predicted the interplay of genetic and environmental factors in obstructive airway diseases.
Key factors like sex and aging were identified early as influencing disease phenotype.
Modern research increasingly validates the need for comprehensive phenotyping to address disease heterogeneity.

Conclusions:

The founders of the Dutch hypothesis were prescient in their understanding of airway disease complexity.
Comprehensive patient characterization beyond simple diagnoses (asthma, COPD, overlap) is essential.
Applying detailed phenotyping in clinical practice can significantly improve disease understanding and management strategies.