Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Thrombectomy assisted by carotid stenting in acute ischemic stroke management: benefits and harms
Henrik Steglich-Arnholm1, Markus Holtmannspötter2, Daniel Kondziella3
1Department of Neurology 2082, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. henrik.steglich@gmail.com.
Insights
Thrombectomy with carotid stenting offers benefits for severe ischemic stroke patients, showing a 68% favorable outcome. Expedited management is key, though risks like stent thrombosis require further investigation for this endovascular therapy.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Extracranial carotid artery occlusion/stenosis with intracranial embolism causes severe ischemic stroke.
- Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has limited efficacy in these cases.
- Endovascular therapy (EVT) with carotid stenting is complex and carries risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the benefits and harms of thrombectomy assisted by carotid stenting.
- To identify factors influencing clinical outcomes and procedural complications.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 47 consecutive stroke patients.
- Patients treated between September 2011 and December 2014.
- Inclusion criteria: carotid occlusion/high-grade stenosis with intracranial embolus.
Main Results:
- Mean age 64.3 years; 85% received initial IVT.
- Early clinical improvement (NIHSS ≥ 10) in 46%; favorable 3-month outcome (mRS ≤ 2) in 68%.
- Complications: 4% symptomatic hemorrhage, 17% stent thrombosis; 9% mortality.
Conclusions:
- Thrombectomy assisted by carotid stenting appears beneficial and reasonably safe for selected stroke patients.
- Expedited patient management is crucial for achieving favorable clinical outcomes.
- Further clinical investigations are needed before recommending this EVT as a standard treatment due to adverse events.
Abstract:
Extracranial carotid artery occlusion or high-grade stenosis with concomitant intracranial embolism causes severe ischemic stroke and shows poor response rates to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Endovascular therapy (EVT) utilizing thrombectomy assisted by carotid stenting was long considered risky because of procedural complexities and necessity of potent platelet inhibition-in particular following IVT. This study assesses the benefits and harms of thrombectomy assisted by carotid stenting and identifies factors associated with clinical outcome and procedural complications. Retrospective single-center analysis of 47 consecutive stroke patients with carotid occlusion or high-grade stenosis and concomitant intracranial embolus treated between September 2011 and December 2014. Benefits included early improvement of stroke severity (NIHSS ≥ 10) or complete remission within 72 h and favorable long-term outcome (mRS ≤ 2). Harms included complications during and following EVT. Mean age was 64.3 years (standard deviation ±12.5), 40 (85%) patients received IVT initially. Median NIHSS was 16 (inter-quartile range 14-19). Mean time from stroke onset to recanalization was 311 min (standard deviation ±78.0). Early clinical improvement was detected in 22 (46%) patients. Favorable outcome at 3 months occurred in 32 (68%) patients. Expedited patient management was associated with favorable clinical outcome. Two (4%) patients experienced symptomatic hemorrhage. Eight (17%) patients experienced stent thrombosis. Four (9%) patients died. Thrombectomy assisted by carotid stenting seems beneficial and reasonably safe with a promising rate of favorable outcome. Nevertheless, adverse events and complications call for additional clinical investigations prior to recommendation as clinical standard. Expeditious patient management is central to achieve good clinical outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

