Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

606
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
606
Fixation and Sectioning01:03

Fixation and Sectioning

8.9K
Two basic types of preparation are used to visualize specimens with a light microscope: wet mounts and fixed specimens.
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...
8.9K
Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy01:20

Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy

7.8K
To be visualized by an electron microscope, either transmission or scanning, biological samples need to be fixed (stabilized) so the electron beam does not destroy them and dried thoroughly (desiccated/dehydrated) so the vacuum does not affect them. Fixation needs to be done as quickly as possible because the sample properties will start changing as soon as it is removed from its natural environment. For example, in a tissue sample, the oxygen levels begin decreasing, causing an altered...
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Options for the Forensic Mental Health Evaluator When Retaining Counsel Is Impaired.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same author

Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2025
Same author

Collateral Consequences for Third-Party Interviewees in Forensic Contexts.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2023
Same author

Trauma-Focused Mitigation Testimony in Capital Sentencing Hearings.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2021
Same author

The Gold Standard and the Pyrite Principle: Toward a Supplemental Frame of Reference.

Frontiers in psychology·2020
Same author

Distractions in Forensic Evaluations.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K

Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations.

Caroline Titcomb Parrott1, Stanley L Brodsky2, Jennifer Kelly Wilson1

  • 1Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States.

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
|September 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mock jurors

Keywords:
Expert witness testimonyInsanity defense biasJuror deliberationsJury decision-makingThin slice observations

More Related Videos

Enhancing Tumor Content through Tumor Macrodissection
10:04

Enhancing Tumor Content through Tumor Macrodissection

Published on: February 12, 2022

12.8K
Techniques for Investigating the Anatomy of the Ant Visual System
08:56

Techniques for Investigating the Anatomy of the Ant Visual System

Published on: November 27, 2017

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
Enhancing Tumor Content through Tumor Macrodissection
10:04

Enhancing Tumor Content through Tumor Macrodissection

Published on: February 12, 2022

12.8K
Techniques for Investigating the Anatomy of the Ant Visual System
08:56

Techniques for Investigating the Anatomy of the Ant Visual System

Published on: November 27, 2017

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Legal Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology

Background:

  • Expert witness testimony is crucial in legal proceedings, particularly for defenses like not guilty by reason of insanity.
  • Juror perceptions of expert credibility can significantly influence case outcomes.
  • The impact of brief testimony exposure on juror decision-making warrants further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how brief exposures to expert witness testimony affect juror impressions of credibility and verdict.
  • To examine the influence of jury deliberation on these impressions and outcomes.
  • To assess the impact of testimony duration on the accuracy of juror predictions.

Main Methods:

  • A mock jury study with 188 participants in 30 juries.
  • A 2 (deliberating vs. non-deliberating jurors) x 3 (testimony length: 30s, 5 min, 10 min) between-subjects design.
  • Participants viewed videotaped testimony from a forensic psychologist.

Main Results:

  • Brief impressions of expert credibility influenced juror perceptions similarly to longer exposures, especially after deliberation.
  • A significant interaction between testimony length (30s slice) and deliberation affected verdicts.
  • Predictive accuracy was observed in the 5-minute testimony slice, but not the shortest (30s) slice.

Conclusions:

  • Individually formed impressions from brief testimony may not directly translate to verdict ballots post-deliberation.
  • Jury deliberation heavily influences how brief impressions of expert testimony are processed and impact verdicts.
  • Understanding the interplay between initial impressions and deliberation is key for evaluating testimony effectiveness.