Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Drug-induced progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: Lessons learned from contrasting natalizumab and rituximab
N S Vermeer1,2, S M J M Straus2,3, A K Mantel-Teeuwisse1
1Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) has been identified as a serious adverse drug reaction (ADR) of several immunomodulatory biologicals. In this study, we contrasted the reporting patterns of PML for two biologicals for which the risk was identified at different points in their lifecycle: natalizumab (before reapproval) and rituximab (nine years postapproval). We found that, apart from the differences in clinical characteristics (age, gender, indication, time to event, fatality), which reflect the diversity in context of use, PML reports for natalizumab were more complete and were received sooner after occurrence. This study serves as an important reminder that spontaneous reports should only be used with great caution to quantify and compare safety profiles across products over time. The observed variability in reporting patterns and heterogeneity of PML cases presents challenges to such comparisons. Lumping uncharacterized PML reports together without taking these differences into account may result in biased comparisons and flawed conclusions about differential safety.
Insights
Reporting patterns for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) differ between natalizumab and rituximab. Natalizumab reports were more complete and timely, highlighting caution needed when comparing drug safety profiles from spontaneous reports.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacovigilance
- Neuroimmunology
- Drug Safety
Background:
- Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a serious adverse drug reaction (ADR) associated with immunomodulatory biological therapies.
- The identification of PML risk has occurred at different stages in the lifecycle of various biologicals, impacting reporting dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To contrast the reporting patterns of PML for natalizumab and rituximab, two biologicals with distinct timelines for risk identification.
- To evaluate the completeness and timeliness of PML adverse event reports for these two agents.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of spontaneous adverse event reports for PML associated with natalizumab and rituximab.
- Examination of report completeness, timeliness, and clinical characteristics (age, gender, indication, time to event, fatality).
Main Results:
- PML reports for natalizumab were found to be more complete and received sooner after occurrence compared to rituximab.
- Significant differences in clinical characteristics of PML cases were observed, reflecting diverse contexts of use for both drugs.
- Variability in reporting patterns and heterogeneity of PML cases pose challenges for direct safety comparisons.
Conclusions:
- Spontaneous adverse event reports require cautious interpretation for quantifying and comparing drug safety profiles over time.
- Lumping uncharacterized PML reports without considering reporting patterns and case heterogeneity can lead to biased comparisons and flawed safety conclusions.
More Related Videos
09:54Assessment of Human Natural Killer Cell Events Driven by FcγRIIIa Engagement in the Presence of Therapeutic Antibodies
Published on: May 22, 2020
10:50Visualizing Impairment of the Endothelial and Glial Barriers of the Neurovascular Unit during Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis In Vivo
Published on: March 26, 2019