Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

55.8K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
55.8K
Estimation of the Physical Quantities01:05

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

8.7K
On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...
8.7K
Measurement: Derived Units03:02

Measurement: Derived Units

57.6K
The International System of Units or SI system, by international agreement, has fixed measurement units for seven fundamental properties: length, mass, time, temperature, electric current, amount of substance, and luminosity. These are called the SI base units.
57.6K
Measurement: Standard Units03:38

Measurement: Standard Units

86.2K
Every measurement provides three kinds of information: the size or magnitude of the measurement (a number), a standard of comparison for the measurement (a unit), and an indication of the uncertainty of the measurement. While the number and unit are explicitly represented when a quantity is written, the uncertainty is an aspect of the errors in the measurement results.
86.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.7K
Measurements of Strain01:27

Measurements of Strain

2.8K
Strain quantifies the deformation of a material under force, typically measured as normal strain, which represents the change in length when compared with the original length. Electrical strain gauges are used for enhanced accuracy. These devices consist of a conductive wire mounted on a paper backing that adheres to the material's surface. These gauges operate on the piezoresistive effect, where the wire's electrical resistance changes in response to mechanical deformation. The strain...
2.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detecting Inconsistencies and Fraud in Research Data: Time for Authors to Share the Data Underlying Their Summary Statistics as a Matter of Course.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor regarding Kamal WM, Maged AM, Salah N, El-Goly NA, El-Sherbiny W, Hassan ES. Impact of ultraviolet radiation on bone density and muscle strength in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled study. Obstet Gynecol Sci . 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.5468/ogs.25077.

Obstetrics & gynecology science·2025
Same author

James "Jim" C. Coyne (1947-2024).

The American psychologist·2025
Same author

INSPECT-SR: a tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Assessing the scientific integrity of the collected work of one author or author group.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

Commentary on "Consumed by Creed".

Aggressive behavior·2024
Same journal

Cumulative adverse childhood experiences and parent-reported allergic conditions and asthma among U.S. children: A nationally representative study.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Natural disaster, social cohesion, and prosociality: A natural experiment.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Practice guidelines regarding psychologists' involvement in pharmacological issues.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP): A constructive shift for psychology?

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Two dimensions of access: Availability and affordability of mental health care across the United States.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Revisiting secondary antisemitism: Antisemitism as a cause, not a consequence, of ingroup-serving Holocaust distortions.

The American psychologist·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.1K

Questionable measures are pretty meaningless.

Nicholas J L Brown1, Paul T P Wong2

  • 1New School of Psychotherapy and Counselling.

The American Psychologist
|September 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This commentary critiques the argument that meaning in life (MIL) is widely experienced and high. It identifies flaws in defining MIL, measuring MIL, and interpreting MIL quantitative data.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Complexities of Achilles Tendon Injuries — Research and Future Directions
08:48

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Complexities of Achilles Tendon Injuries — Research and Future Directions

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.1K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Complexities of Achilles Tendon Injuries — Research and Future Directions
08:48

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Complexities of Achilles Tendon Injuries — Research and Future Directions

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Philosophy

Background:

  • The original article by Heintzelman and King posits that meaning in life (MIL) is broadly experienced and prevalent.
  • This commentary critically evaluates the foundational arguments presented in their work.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and discuss perceived limitations in the original article's claims regarding meaning in life (MIL).
  • To scrutinize the definition, measurement, and interpretation of MIL as presented by Heintzelman and King.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the arguments presented in the original article.
  • Critique of the definitions and measurement tools used for meaning in life (MIL).
  • Examination of the interpretation of quantitative data related to MIL.

Main Results:

  • The definition of meaning in life (MIL) lacks clarity.
  • The validity of instruments used to measure MIL is questionable.
  • The interpretation of quantitative findings on MIL is potentially erroneous.

Conclusions:

  • The original article's claims about the widespread and high levels of meaning in life (MIL) may be overstated due to methodological and conceptual issues.
  • Further refinement in defining and measuring MIL is necessary for accurate understanding.