Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Brain Imaging01:14

Brain Imaging

956
Brain imaging technologies provide critical insights into both the structure and function of the human brain, enabling medical professionals and researchers to diagnose, study, and treat neurological disorders or psychiatric disorders more effectively.
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans),  magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),  functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic...
956
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:27

Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

361
Introduction:Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or MRI, can include a specialized imaging technique of the urinary system known as Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU). This radiation-free technique uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed images with the help of a computer. MRU is particularly effective for visualizing fluid-filled structures like the kidneys, ureters, and bladder.Applications of MRI in the Genitourinary SystemKidneys and Ureters: MRI detects tumors, cysts,...
361
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development01:30

Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development

394
Social-emotional experiences and cultural influences play significant roles in shaping gender development. During middle childhood, from ages 6 to 11, peer groups become dominant in reinforcing gender norms. Children in this age group often align with same-gender peer groups, which actively encourage behaviors that conform to traditional gender roles. For instance, boys may be discouraged from engaging in activities perceived as feminine, reinforcing culturally dictated norms about masculinity...
394

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensor-Acquired Reachable Workspace (RWS) Correlates with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Function in Stroke as Measured by Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Self-Care.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Too much of a good thing? A multilevel examination of listening to music at work.

The Journal of applied psychology·2024
Same author

How deep is AI's love? Understanding relational AI.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Ethical leadership as a substitute for justice enactment: An information-processing perspective.

The Journal of applied psychology·2019
Same author

Challenges and supports towards the integration of ePortfolios in education. Lessons to be learned from Ireland.

Heliyon·2019
Same author

Advancing the Strategic Messages Affecting Robot Trust Effect: The Dynamic of User- and Robot-Generated Content on Human-Robot Trust and Interaction Outcomes.

Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

17.0K

Gender differences in justice evaluations: Evidence from fMRI.

James H Dulebohn1, Robert B Davison2, Seungcheol Austin Lee3

  • 1School of Human Resources and Labor Relations, Michigan State University.

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|September 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals significant gender differences in how the brain processes justice information, with females showing greater activation. These differences also impact bargaining behavior, affecting how individuals respond to unfair offers.

More Related Videos

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation
14:04

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation

Published on: August 26, 2011

13.3K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
10:45

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions

Published on: July 6, 2011

12.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

17.0K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation
14:04

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation

Published on: August 26, 2011

13.3K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
10:45

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions

Published on: July 6, 2011

12.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Neuroeconomics

Background:

  • Justice research has produced conflicting findings regarding gender differences.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for organizational behavior and decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate gender differences in brain activation patterns during the processing of procedural and distributive justice information using fMRI.
  • To explore the neural underpinnings of gender-specific responses to justice and injustice.
  • To examine the influence of gender on bargaining behavior in response to distributive injustice.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure brain activity.
  • Manipulation of procedural and distributive justice scenarios.
  • Ultimatum game to assess bargaining behavior.

Main Results:

  • Females exhibited greater neural activation than males in response to both procedural and distributive justice information.
  • Gender and distributive injustice interacted, leading females to reject ultimatum game offers more frequently than males.
  • Activation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and ventral striatum during procedural justice evaluation correlated with offer rejection in females, but not males.

Conclusions:

  • Gender significantly influences justice information processing and its neural correlates.
  • Observed gender differences in neural activity and bargaining behavior have implications for managerial practices.
  • The study highlights the importance of considering gender in the context of justice perceptions and decision-making.