Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Definitions and Outcome Measures in Pediatric Functional Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders: A Systematic Review
Amara Nassar-Sheikh Rashid1, Jan A Taminiau, Marc A Benninga
1Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders like functional dyspepsia (FD) lack standardized outcome measures in clinical trials. Consistent definitions and validated instruments are crucial for comparing therapeutic interventions in children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
Background:
- Functional disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract are common in children, including functional dyspepsia (FD), cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS), adolescent rumination syndrome (ARS), and aerophagia.
- Management of these pediatric conditions is challenging, with diverse therapeutic approaches.
- Heterogeneity in definitions and outcome measures across studies complicates treatment evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically assess the definitions and outcome measures used in therapeutic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders.
- To identify variations in how FD, CVS, ARS, and aerophagia are defined and their outcomes measured in the literature.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE/PubMed was conducted up to February 25, 2015.
- Included were English-language therapeutic RCTs or systematic reviews of RCTs involving subjects aged 4–18 years (0–18 for CVS).
- Study quality was assessed using the Delphi list.
Main Results:
- Out of 1398 articles identified, only 8 met the inclusion criteria (7 for FD, 1 for CVS).
- While Rome criteria were generally used for definitions, outcome measures varied significantly across all included studies.
- Seventy-five percent of trials were of good methodological quality, but only 57% utilized validated pain scales.
Conclusions:
- Therapeutic trials for pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders exhibit considerable variation in outcome measures.
- There is a notable lack of research evaluating treatment regimens for CVS, ARS, and aerophagia.
- Standardized definitions, outcome measures, and validated instruments are essential for enabling meaningful comparisons between intervention studies.
Objectives:
Functional disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract are frequently diagnosed in children. Four different clinical entities are addressed by the Rome III committee: functional dyspepsia (FD), cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS), adolescent rumination syndrome (ARS), and aerophagia. Management of these disorders is often difficult leading to a wide variety in therapeutic interventions. We hypothesize that definitions and outcome measures in these studies are heterogeneous as well. Our aim is to systematically assess how these disorders and outcomes are defined in therapeutic randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Study Design:
CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE/PubMed were searched from inception to February 25, 2015. Search terms were FD, CVS, ARS, and aerophagia. Therapeutic RCTs, or systematic reviews of RCTs, in English language including subjects ages 4 to 18 years (0-18 years for CVS) were evaluated. Quality was assessed using the Delphi list.
Results:
A total of 1398 articles were found of which 8 articles were included. Seven concerned FD and 1 concerned CVS. In all of the studies, Rome criteria or similar definitions were used; all the studies however used different outcome measures. Seventy-five percent of the trials were of good methodological quality. Only 57% used validated pain scales.
Conclusions:
Different outcome measures are used in therapeutic trials on functional disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract. There is a clear paucity of trials evaluating different treatment regimens regarding CVS, ARS, and aerophagia. Uniform definitions, outcome measures, and validated instruments are needed to make a comparison between intervention studies possible.
More Related Videos
09:18Measurements of Motor Function and Other Clinical Outcome Parameters in Ambulant Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Published on: January 12, 2019
06:01Author Spotlight: Reliable and Reproducible In Vitro Assessment of Drug Impact on Rat Intestinal Tubes
Published on: July 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders
Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow
Purpose and Procedure
Patients undergoing this procedure ingest a liquid containing barium sulfate with a chalky...