Towards a Next-Generation Sequencing Diagnostic Service for Tumour Genotyping: A Comparison of Panels and Platforms

George J Burghel1, Carolyn D Hurst2, Christopher M Watson3

  • 1Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK ; Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.

Insights

Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels accurately detect clinically actionable mutations in tumour DNA. This study optimized diagnostic workflows by evaluating three enrichment strategies for cancer gene panels, showing reliable variant detection from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genomics
  • Molecular Diagnostics

Background:

  • Clinically actionable mutations in diagnostic tumor specimens guide targeted therapy selection.
  • Tumor genetic diagnostics are shifting towards multigene analysis due to the increasing number of identified mutations.
  • Whole-genome sequencing is not yet feasible for routine diagnostic laboratories, necessitating targeted mutation detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To optimize diagnostic workflows for targeted mutation detection.
  • To evaluate three distinct target enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms.
  • To assess the accuracy of variant detection using different gene panels and sequencing platforms, including from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) DNA.

Main Methods:

  • Three target enrichment strategies were evaluated: Fluidigm Access Array (13 genes, MiSeq), Oxford Gene Technologies (OGT) SureSeq Solid Tumour panel (60 genes, MiSeq), and Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel (50 genes, Ion PGM).
  • DNA from eight characterized cancer cell lines (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks and fresh cultures) was analyzed using the selected panels.
  • Next-generation sequencing was performed on Illumina MiSeq and Ion PGM platforms.

Main Results:

  • All evaluated panels successfully detected mutations in core cancer genes such as KRAS, BRAF, and EGFR.
  • Accurate variant detection was achieved even when sequencing DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens.
  • The study demonstrated the feasibility of using targeted gene panels for routine tumor genetic diagnostics.

Conclusions:

  • Targeted mutation detection using NGS panels is a viable approach for clinical diagnostics.
  • The evaluated enrichment strategies and NGS platforms provide accurate detection of actionable mutations from FFPE tumor samples.
  • Optimized diagnostic workflows utilizing targeted gene panels can support the selection of targeted therapeutics in cancer care.