Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Poisson Probability Distribution01:09

Poisson Probability Distribution

12.5K
A Poisson probability distribution is a discrete probability distribution. It gives the probability of a number of events occurring in a fixed interval of time or space if these events happen at a known average rate and independently of the time since the last event. For example, a book editor might be interested in the number of words spelled incorrectly in a particular book. It might be that, on average, there are five words spelled incorrectly in 100 pages. The interval is 100 pages.
The...
12.5K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

594
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
594
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

5.7K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
5.7K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

314
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
314
Poisson's And Laplace's Equation01:25

Poisson's And Laplace's Equation

4.6K
The electric potential of the system can be calculated by relating it to the electric charge densities that give rise to the electric potential. The differential form of Gauss's law expresses the electric field's divergence in terms of the electric charge density.
4.6K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.4K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving Embedding of Graphs With Missing Data by Soft Manifolds.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2025
Same author

Physics-informed machine learning digital twin for reconstructing prostate cancer tumor growth via PSA tests.

NPJ digital medicine·2025
Same author

A primer on variational inference for physics-informed deep generative modelling.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2025
Same author

Fully Bayesian Autoencoders with Latent Sparse Gaussian Processes.

Proceedings of machine learning research·2024
Same author

Inferring networks from time series: A neural approach.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

Scaling digital twins from the artisanal to the industrial.

Nature computational science·2024
Same journal

Relation DETR+: Exploring Explicit Position Relation Prior for Dense Prediction.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

RBF++: Quantifying and Optimizing Reasoning Boundaries across Measurable and Unmeasurable Capabilities for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

CAFE: Cross-View Adaptive Fusion and Cluster Center Enhancement for Robust Multi-View Clustering.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

DIVER: Reinforced Diffusion Breaks Imitation Bottlenecks in End-to-End Autonomous Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Ethics-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Rare-Event Risk Control in Interactive Urban Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Learning Shape Anchors for Holistic Indoor Scene Understanding.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K

Pseudo-Marginal Bayesian Inference for Gaussian Processes.

Maurizio Filippone, Mark Girolami

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
    |September 10, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a novel pseudo-marginal Markov chain Monte Carlo method for Gaussian process models. It enables accurate Bayesian inference and uncertainty quantification in predictions, improving upon existing sampling techniques.

    More Related Videos

    A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
    12:39

    A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

    Published on: December 10, 2012

    11.8K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    14.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
    08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    3.1K
    A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
    12:39

    A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

    Published on: December 10, 2012

    11.8K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    14.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Statistics
    • Machine Learning
    • Probabilistic Modeling

    Background:

    • Gaussian process (GP) priors are powerful in probabilistic modeling but present challenges in exact Bayesian inference and uncertainty quantification for predictions.
    • Existing methods struggle with efficient posterior simulation and integrating all model parameters, limiting full Bayesian analysis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a general and effective methodology for addressing challenges in Gaussian process prior adoption.
    • To improve Bayesian inference and uncertainty quantification in GP-based hierarchical statistical models.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized the pseudo-marginal approach to Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).
    • Applied probit regression as a working example to demonstrate the methodology.
    • Developed improved sampling methods for the posterior distribution of Gaussian Process covariance function parameters.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed pseudo-marginal MCMC approach efficiently handles Bayesian inference and uncertainty quantification.
    • Demonstrated superior performance over existing sampling methods for simulating posterior distributions.
    • Showcased the feasibility of Monte Carlo integration for all model parameters, enhancing prediction uncertainty quantification.

    Conclusions:

    • The methodology provides a powerful tool for full Bayesian inference in GP-based hierarchical models.
    • Offers superior quantification of uncertainty in predictions compared to state-of-the-art methods.
    • Confirms the effectiveness through extensive comparisons with probabilistic classifiers.