Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Orientation discrimination for objects defined by relative motion and objects defined by luminance contrast.

D Regan1

  • 1Department of Psychology BSB, York University, Ontario, Canada.

Vision Research
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimization of ovine bone decalcification for increased cellular detail: a parametric study.

Journal of histotechnology·2021
Same author

Immune regulation of canine tumour and macrophage PD-L1 expression.

Veterinary and comparative oncology·2016
Same author

Oral and anal sex are key to sustaining gonorrhoea at endemic levels in MSM populations: a mathematical model.

Sexually transmitted infections·2015
Same author

Head and neck cancer in Australia between 1982 and 2005 show increasing incidence of potentially HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers.

British journal of cancer·2011
Same author

Some early uses of evoked brain responses in investigations of human visual function.

Vision research·2008
Same author

Ethnically mismatched cord blood transplants in African Americans: the Saint Louis Cord Blood Bank experience.

Cytotherapy·2007
Same journal

Impact of crowding on visual appearance and performance in amblyopia.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Orientation discrimination is similarly acute for motion-defined and contrast-defined bars at high dot contrast and speed. However, motion-defined bars show rapid declines in discrimination with reduced contrast or speed.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational vision

Background:

  • Orientation discrimination is a fundamental visual capability.
  • Distinguishing between motion-defined and contrast-defined stimuli is crucial for understanding visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare orientation discrimination performance between motion-defined and contrast-defined dotted bars.
  • To investigate the influence of dot contrast and speed on discrimination accuracy for both stimulus types.

Main Methods:

  • A motion-defined bar was created using opposing dot velocities.
  • A contrast-defined bar was generated by removing background dots.
  • Orientation discrimination thresholds were measured for both bar types under varying contrast and speed conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Orientation discrimination was comparable (approx. 0.5 degrees) for both motion-defined and contrast-defined bars at high dot contrast and speed.
  • Discrimination for motion-defined bars degraded sharply with reduced contrast and speed, unlike contrast-defined bars.
  • A 4:1 contrast range showed discrimination collapse for motion-defined bars while remaining acute for contrast-defined bars.

Conclusions:

  • Motion-defined stimuli are more sensitive to reductions in dot contrast and speed than contrast-defined stimuli.
  • These findings suggest potential differences in neural mechanisms for processing motion-defined versus contrast-defined orientations.
  • The results challenge current theories of orientation discrimination.