Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

685
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
685
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.4K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

1.8K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
1.8K
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

1.2K
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
1.2K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

17.3K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
17.3K
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

576
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
576

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the trustworthiness of health guidelines recommendations: the transparent, rigorous, useable, standardized, and trustworthy guide (TRUSTGUIDES) tools development.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Advancing AI Competency in Graduate Medical Education: A Developmental Framework.

AJPM focus·2026
Same author

Virtual music therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic-an updated scoping review.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same author

Multidimensional data analysis and classification using SMIAL.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

2024 Author Acknowledgment and Articles of the Year.

AJPM focus·2026
Same author

GRADE Guidance: Update on Developing Good Practice Statements in Guidelines.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Intermittent iron supplementation for reducing anaemia and its associated impairments in adolescent and adult menstruating women.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020
Same journal

The chameleon effect: adapting, advancing and aligning.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020
Same journal

Interventions to ensure medication safety in acute care: an umbrella review.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020
Same journal

Development of a novel patient focussed symptom severity index for use in assessing and treating inflammatory conditions of the lactating breast: a Delphi study.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020
Same journal

Completeness of intervention reporting in neurology randomized controlled trials: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020
Same journal

The Work Organisation Assessment Questionnaire: validation for use with community nurses and paramedics.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jared M Campbell1, Miloslav Klugar, Sandrine Ding

  • 11The Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 2Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, The Czech Republic (Middle European) Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care: An Affiliated Centre of The Joanna Briggs Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic 3Bureau d'Echanges des Savoirs Pour des praTiques Exemplaires de Soins (BEST): An Affiliate Centre of The Joanna Briggs Institute, Lausanne, Switzerland 4Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Institute for the Study of Child Development, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA 5Center for Kliniske Retningslinjer, Institut for Medicin and Sundhedsteknologi, Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg, Denmark 6Northeast Institute for Evidence Synthesis and Translation, A Collaborating Center of the Joanna Briggs Institute, Division of Nursing Science, Rutgers School of Nursing 7Department of Quantitative Methods, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Newark, New Jersey, USA 8Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
|September 11, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic reviews synthesize evidence on diagnostic test accuracy to guide clinical decisions. This article details updated guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute for conducting these crucial reviews effectively.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Evidence-based healthcare

Background:

  • Systematic reviews synthesize all available evidence to answer clinical questions and assess study quality.
  • The Joanna Briggs Institute provides methodological guidance for systematic reviews, including those on diagnostic test accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize updated methodological guidance for conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
  • To provide detailed advice for effective systematic review conduct in diagnostic test accuracy research.

Main Methods:

  • The article summarizes updated guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute and its international collaboration.
  • Guidance covers the effective conduct of systematic reviews for diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Main Results:

  • Updated guidance is available for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
  • Detailed advice is provided for reviewers in this specialized area.

Conclusions:

  • Effective systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy are essential for informed clinical decision-making.
  • The Joanna Briggs Institute's updated guidance supports high-quality evidence synthesis in this field.