Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

1.8K
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
1.8K
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

1.7K
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
1.7K
Shape and Texture of Coarse Aggregate01:25

Shape and Texture of Coarse Aggregate

1.2K
Aggregate shape is classified based on the relative sharpness or roundness of the edges and corners. This classification includes categories like rounded, angular, elongated, and flaky, each with specific characteristics. Rounded aggregates, fully shaped by attrition, are typical of river or seashore gravel, while angular aggregates, such as crushed rock, have well-defined edges. Aggregates that are elongated and flaky are less desirable, as they can reduce the workability and strength of...
1.2K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

9.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
9.1K
Vision01:24

Vision

61.6K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
61.6K
Visual System01:26

Visual System

2.3K
Light enters the eye through the cornea, a transparent, dome-shaped surface covering the surface of the eyeball that helps to direct and focus incoming light. This light is then channeled toward the pupil, an adjustable opening whose size is controlled by the iris. The iris, a pigmented muscle, regulates the amount of light entering the eye by contracting or dilating the pupil, thereby ensuring optimal light levels for clear vision.
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Face pareidolia is sensitive to spectral power and orientation energy.

i-Perception·2025
Same author

The impact of simulated cataract on face learning.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Contrast negation increases face pareidolia rates in natural scenes.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Effects of maze appearance on maze solving.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Is visual information use during facial emotion recognition related to eating disorder symptoms in college-aged men and women? An experimental study.

Journal of eating disorders·2024
Same author

Mice learn to identify and discriminate sugar solutions based on odor cues.

Chemical senses·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.7K

The Visual N1 Is Sensitive to Deviations from Natural Texture Appearance.

Benjamin Balas1, Catherine Conlin2

  • 1Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States of America; Center for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States of America.

Plos One
|September 11, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Visual processing of natural textures is sensitive to appearance changes. The N1 component of visual event-related potentials (ERPs) reflects disruptions in texture appearance, unlike the P1 component.

More Related Videos

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
07:04

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.7K
Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.7K
Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
07:04

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.7K
Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Natural texture appearance is crucial for efficient visual processing.
  • Deviations like contrast negation or synthetic generation impair texture discrimination.
  • Understanding neural responses to these disruptions is key to visual perception research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how visual event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically the P1 and N1 components, are affected by violations of natural texture appearance.
  • To determine if contrast polarity and synthetic texture generation differentially impact neural processing stages.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a same/different image discrimination task using natural and synthetic textures, presented in positive and negative contrast.
  • Continuous electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded, focusing on P1 and N1 components over occipital sites.

Main Results:

  • The P1 component showed no sensitivity to contrast polarity or real/synthetic appearance.
  • The N1 component was sensitive to both contrast polarity reversal and synthetic texture appearance.
  • Different effects on N1 latency suggest distinct processing impacts for polarity reversal and synthetic appearance.

Conclusions:

  • Early visual processing stages (indexed by P1) are robust to low-level appearance changes.
  • Later visual processing stages (indexed by N1) are sensitive to higher-order statistical regularities in natural textures.
  • Distinct violations of natural texture appearance differentially impact neural responses, highlighting specific processing pathways.