Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

07:30
Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
16.1K
The Reliability of Strength Tests Performed In Elevated Shoulder Positions Using a Handheld Dynamometer
Sally J McLaine1, Karen A Ginn, Cecilia M Kitic
1Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
|September 11, 2015
Summary
Reliable shoulder strength testing in elevated positions is crucial for swimmers. This study found good to excellent intrarater reliability for isometric strength tests, regardless of body position, aiding in injury prevention and performance assessment.
Area of Science:
- Sports Medicine
- Biomechanics
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- Reliable measurement of shoulder strength is vital for assessing athletes in overhead sports.
- Swimmers are at high risk for shoulder pain and movement issues due to repetitive overhead activities.
- Existing research has not established the reliability of isometric shoulder strength tests in elevated positions without manual stabilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the relative and absolute intrarater reliability of shoulder strength tests.
- To assess the functional relevance of these tests for swimming.
- To evaluate reliability across three common clinical body positions (supine, prone, sitting).
Main Methods:
- A repeated-measures reliability study was conducted in a research laboratory.
- Fifteen healthy university students and staff (mean age 24 years) were tested.
- Isometric shoulder strength tests (flexion, extension, internal/external rotation) were performed in elevated humeral positions using a handheld dynamometer, with retesting after 48 hours.
Main Results:
- All tested shoulder strength measures demonstrated good to excellent intrarater reliability (ICC values ranging from .87 to .99).
- Intrarater reliability remained consistent across all tested body positions.
- The minimal detectable change percentage (MDC%) was below 16% for all tests, and below 11% for tests in the supine position.
Conclusions:
- Isometric shoulder strength tests in elevated positions (flexion, extension, rotation) show excellent intrarater reliability.
- Reliability is maintained irrespective of the body position used (supine, prone, sitting).
- A strength change exceeding 15% in any tested position indicates a meaningful difference, useful for clinical assessment.

