Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing

Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing

In the same year as the discovery of the Sanger sequencing method, another group of scientists, Allan Maxam and Walter Gilbert, demonstrated their chemical-cleavage method for DNA sequencing. The Maxam-Gilbert method relies on using different chemicals that can cleave the DNA sequence at specific sites, the separation of resulting DNA fragments of variable size using electrophoresis, and deciphering the DNA sequence from the resulting gel bands.
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...

Proofreading

Proofreading

Proofreading

Proofreading

Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore, it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...

DNA Base Pairing

DNA Base Pairing

DNA Base Pairing

DNA Base Pairing

Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,

DNA Isolation

DNA Isolation

DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Genome-wide association studies for feed efficiency, production and feeding behavior traits in Canadian purebred Duroc pigs.

Journal of animal science·2026

Same author

Preference and behavioral responses to synbiotic supplementation via drinking water in laying hens under social stress.

Poultry science·2026

Same author

Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, growth performance, and feeding behaviors traits in Canadian Duroc pigs.

Journal of animal science·2026

Same author

Urine, saliva, and serum metabolomics predict female pig reproductive potential status using machine learning modelling.

Reproduction (Cambridge, England)·2026

Same author

ASAS-NANP Symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: construction of supervised machine learning regression pipelines for livestock data modeling: a case studys.

Journal of animal science·2025

Same author

A comparative analysis of machine learning classifiers for modeling the number of liveborn piglets.

Journal of animal science·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

DNA-Tethered RNA Polymerase for Programmable In vitro Transcription and Molecular Computation

DNA-Tethered RNA Polymerase for Programmable In vitro Transcription and Molecular Computation

Published on: December 29, 2021

Thermodynamic Post-Processing versus GC-Content Pre-Processing for DNA Codes Satisfying the Hamming Distance and

Dan Tulpan, Derek H Smith, Roberto Montemanni

IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics

|September 11, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares DNA strand design methods, finding that relying solely on melting temperature calculations for post-processing is more effective than pre-processing with GC-content, especially for large DNA sets.

More Related Videos

Single-Molecule Real-Time Visualization of DNA Unwinding by CMG Helicase

Single-Molecule Real-Time Visualization of DNA Unwinding by CMG Helicase

Published on: September 27, 2024

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales

Published on: January 20, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

DNA-Tethered RNA Polymerase for Programmable In vitro Transcription and Molecular Computation

DNA-Tethered RNA Polymerase for Programmable In vitro Transcription and Molecular Computation

Published on: December 29, 2021

Single-Molecule Real-Time Visualization of DNA Unwinding by CMG Helicase

Single-Molecule Real-Time Visualization of DNA Unwinding by CMG Helicase

Published on: September 27, 2024

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales

Published on: January 20, 2023

Area of Science:

Computational Biology
Bioinformatics
Synthetic Biology

Background:

DNA strand design algorithms often incorporate GC-content constraints for pre-processing.
GC-content is an unreliable predictor of DNA hybridization strength.
Thermodynamic calculations offer a more accurate method for assessing DNA strand properties.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate an alternative DNA strand design approach.
To compare pre-processing with GC-content versus post-processing with melting temperatures.
To determine the optimal strategy for generating large DNA sets with desired properties.

Main Methods:

Modified algorithms to exclude GC-content pre-processing.
Utilized thermodynamic calculations for post-processing DNA strands.
Compared the efficacy of GC-content pre-processing against melting temperature post-processing.

Main Results:

The approach relying solely on post-processing with melting temperatures yields large DNA sets with satisfactory melting points.
GC-content pre-processing is a less effective predictor of hybridization strength.
The two methods (GC-content pre-processing and melting temperature post-processing) are complementary for large DNA set generation.

Conclusions:

Post-processing with melting temperature calculations is a superior alternative to GC-content pre-processing for DNA strand design.
This alternative approach shows significant improvements, particularly with linear construction algorithms.
Optimizing DNA strand design requires accurate thermodynamic modeling over simple compositional constraints.