Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
Published on: August 16, 2017
Improving Retrieval Efficacy of Homology Searches Using the False Discovery Rate
Abstract:
Over the past few decades, discovery based on sequence homology has become a widely accepted practice. Consequently, comparative accuracy of retrieval algorithms (e.g., BLAST) has been rigorously studied for improvement. Unlike most components of retrieval algorithms, the E-value threshold criterion has yet to be thoroughly investigated. An investigation of the threshold is important as it exclusively dictates which sequences are declared relevant and irrelevant. In this paper, we introduce the false discovery rate (FDR) statistic as a replacement for the uniform threshold criterion in order to improve efficacy in retrieval systems. Using NCBI's BLAST and PSI-BLAST software packages, we demonstrate the applicability of such a replacement in both non-iterative (BLASTFDR) and iterative (PSI-BLAST(FDR)) homology searches. For each application, we performed an evaluation of retrieval efficacy with five different multiple testing methods on a large training database. For each algorithm, we choose the best performing method, Benjamini-Hochberg, as the default statistic. As measured by the threshold average precision, BLAST(FDR) yielded 14.1 percent better retrieval performance than BLAST on a large (5,161 queries) test database and PSI-BLAST(FDR) attained 11.8 percent better retrieval performance than PSI-BLAST. The C++ source code specific to BLAST(FDR) and PSI-BLAST(FDR) and instructions are available at http://www.cs.mtsu.edu/~hcarroll/blast_fdr/.
More Related Videos
07:08Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
05:35An Integrated Workflow of Identification and Quantification on FDR Control-Based Untargeted Metabolome
Published on: September 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Homologous Recombination
Drug Discovery: Overview
Errors In Hypothesis Tests