Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

497
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
497
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

15.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
15.7K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.5K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

19.1K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
19.1K
Bootstrapping01:24

Bootstrapping

979
The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is...
979

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safe Fairness Guarantees Without Demographics in Classification: Spectral Uncertainty Set Perspective.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same author

Editorial: Ethical Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence.

Frontiers in big data·2021
Same author

Causal Datasheet for Datasets: An Evaluation Guide for Real-World Data Analysis and Data Collection Design Using Bayesian Networks.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2021
Same author

Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target Labels.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2021
Same author

Branch-recombinant Gaussian processes for analysis of perturbations in biological time series.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2018
Same author

Unsupervised Many-to-Many Object Matching for Relational Data.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2016
Same journal

Relation DETR+: Exploring Explicit Position Relation Prior for Dense Prediction.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

RBF++: Quantifying and Optimizing Reasoning Boundaries across Measurable and Unmeasurable Capabilities for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

CAFE: Cross-View Adaptive Fusion and Cluster Center Enhancement for Robust Multi-View Clustering.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

DIVER: Reinforced Diffusion Breaks Imitation Bottlenecks in End-to-End Autonomous Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Ethics-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Rare-Event Risk Control in Interactive Urban Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Learning Shape Anchors for Holistic Indoor Scene Understanding.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

863

A Very Simple Safe-Bayesian Random Forest.

Novi Quadrianto, Zoubin Ghahramani

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
    |September 11, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a novel Safe-Bayesian random forest. It offers competitive accuracy and speed compared to existing methods, providing robust predictions even with incorrect models.

    More Related Videos

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.7K
    Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
    04:35

    Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

    Published on: July 3, 2020

    3.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

    Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
    07:13

    Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

    Published on: April 18, 2025

    863
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.7K
    Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
    04:35

    Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

    Published on: July 3, 2020

    3.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Machine Learning
    • Computational Statistics

    Background:

    • Random forests are ensemble methods that average predictions from de-correlated decision trees.
    • Existing methods often rely on computationally intensive or potentially inaccurate probabilistic models.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce a new, efficient, and robust random forest generation method.
    • To develop a 'Safe-Bayesian' approach that ensures good predictive performance.

    Main Methods:

    • Randomly sampling decision trees from a prior distribution.
    • Employing a weighted ensemble of predictive probabilities using a power likelihood for aggregation.
    • Developing a 'safe' aggregation procedure that is not strictly Bayesian but offers robustness.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed Safe-Bayesian random forest demonstrates superior speed and accuracy compared to Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) or Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) based Bayesian decision trees.
    • It achieves performance competitive with traditional entropy or Gini optimized random forests.
    • The method is empirically shown to be simple to construct.

    Conclusions:

    • The Safe-Bayesian random forest offers a computationally efficient and accurate alternative for ensemble modeling.
    • Its 'safeness' ensures reliable predictions, making it a valuable tool even when underlying assumptions are violated.
    • This approach simplifies the construction of powerful random forests.