Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ranks01:02

Ranks

578
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
578
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test01:21

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

893
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a nonparametric test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the distributions of two independent samples. This test is designed specifically for two independent populations and has the following key requirements:
893
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

575
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
575
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

1.2K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
1.2K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

605
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
605
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.6K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

3D inversion recovery ultrashort echo time MRI can detect demyelination in cuprizone-treated mice.

Frontiers in neuroimaging·2024
Same author

Psychoeducational and Skill-building Interventions for Emotion Dysregulation.

Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America·2021
Same author

An Application of Endpoint Detection to Bivariate Data in Tau-Path Order.

Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting·2015
Same author

How Stable Are Top Choices Over Time? An Investigation Into Preferences Among Popular Baby Names In The United States.

Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting·2015
Same author

Cladograms with Path to Event (ClaPTE): a novel algorithm to detect associations between genotypes or phenotypes using phylogenies.

Computers in biology and medicine·2015
Same author

MICE models: superior to the HERG model in predicting Torsade de Pointes.

Scientific reports·2013
Same journal

Sensitivity Analysis of Life History Data with Loss to Follow-up: Extending Multistate Models Using Multiple Imputation.

Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting·2026
Same journal

Random Change-Point Non-linear Mixed Effects Model for left-censored longitudinal data: An application to HIV surveillance.

Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting·2024
Same journal

Design Issues in Longitudinal Studies.

Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting·2023
Same journal

Multilevel Matching in Natural Experimental Studies: Application to Stepping up Counties.

Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting·2021
Same journal

Adaptive Design in the National Immunization Survey-Teen Provider Record Check Phase.

Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting·2020
Same journal

An Evaluation of the Impact of Using an Alternate Caller ID Display in the National Immunization Survey.

Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K

Is There a Partial Consensus Ordering Between Rankings?

Srinath Sampath1, Joseph S Verducci1

  • 1The Ohio State University, 1958 Neil Avenue, 404 Cockins Hall, Columbus, OH 43210-1247.

Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting
|September 12, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method to detect when agreement between two rankings becomes random noise. The novel locally smooth estimator improves upon existing ranking analysis techniques.

Keywords:
consensusmaximum likelihood estimationmultistage modelpartial rankingsrank aggregationtop-K rank list

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.8K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Data Analysis
  • Ranking Methods

Background:

  • Assessing agreement between ranked lists is crucial in various fields.
  • Distinguishing genuine agreement from random chance in rankings presents a challenge.
  • Existing methods may not accurately capture the point of agreement degeneration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an innovative approach for determining when agreement between two rankings becomes noise.
  • To address the problem of ranking agreement degeneration.
  • To develop a more robust estimator for ranking agreement.

Main Methods:

  • Modification of the Fligner and Verducci (1988) multistage model for rankings.
  • Transition from maximum likelihood of conditional agreement to a locally smooth estimator.
  • Utilizing simulation studies to evaluate the proposed method's performance.

Main Results:

  • The proposed locally smooth estimator demonstrates strong performance across various simulated conditions.
  • The innovation effectively identifies the point at which ranking agreement degenerates into noise.
  • The method shows promise in practical applications of ranking analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The developed locally smooth estimator offers an improved approach to analyzing ranking agreement.
  • This method provides a reliable tool for distinguishing meaningful agreement from random noise in ranked data.
  • Further extensions and applications of this technique are planned.