Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Task constraints and infant grip configurations.

K M Newell1, D M Scully, P V McDonald

  • 1Department of Kinesiology, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801.

Developmental Psychobiology
|December 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Task experience influences coordinative structures and performance variables in learning a slalom ski-simulator task.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2018
Same author

The pattern of coupling dynamics between postural motion, isotonic hand movements and physiological tremor.

Neuroscience letters·2014
Same author

Motor learning without knowledge of results through the development of a response recognition mechanism.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Variability of practice and transfer of training.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

More on absolute error, etc.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Performance criteria for stabilometer learning.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same journal

Low Pregnancy Cortisol and Infant Socioemotional Problems: The Mediating Role of Postpartum Depressive Symptoms.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
Same journal

Bedding Type Modulates the Effects of Postpartum Resource Scarcity on Maternal Behavior in Rats.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
Same journal

Inflammatory Stress Response During Pregnancy as a Connecting Link in Intergenerational Risk Cascades.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
Same journal

Maternal Early Pregnancy Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Metabolites Correlate With Newborn Resting-State Functional Connectivity.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
Same journal

Navigating Stress: Exploring the Role of Empathy in Caregiving.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
Same journal

Children With Idiopathic Toe Walking Display Different Cortical Activation Patterns When Interpreting Tactile Sensation.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
See all related articles

Infants as young as 4 months adapt their grip based on object properties. While 4-month-olds use touch and sight, 8-month-olds rely more on vision for grasping.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Motor Control
  • Infant Perception

Background:

  • Infant grasping development is traditionally viewed as a sequential process.
  • Understanding how infants adapt prehensile grip to object properties is crucial for developmental studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the grip configurations of infants aged 4-8 months when grasping objects of varying size and shape.
  • To determine if younger infants differentiate grip based on object properties similarly to older infants.
  • To explore the sensory modalities (visual vs. haptic) used by infants to inform grip adjustments.

Main Methods:

  • Observational study examining prehensile grip in 4- and 8-month-old infants.
  • Objects of varying size and shape were presented for grasping.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of grip configurations and reliance on visual versus haptic information.

    • Main Results:

    • Infants at 4 months systematically adjust grip configurations based on object properties, mirroring 8-month-olds' abilities.
    • Younger infants (4 months) integrate haptic and visual systems for object property information.
    • Older infants (8 months) predominantly utilize visual information for grip differentiation.

    Conclusions:

    • Infant prehensile behavior is more adaptive and flexible than traditional models suggest.
    • Infants utilize different sensory emphases to achieve similar grip configurations for specific objects.
    • Developmental sequences of infant prehension may be overly rigid and underestimate functional adaptation.